hbase-issues mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Enis Soztutar (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] [Commented] (HBASE-9906) Restore snapshot fails to restore the meta edits sporadically
Date Thu, 07 Nov 2013 00:46:17 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-9906?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13815510#comment-13815510
] 

Enis Soztutar commented on HBASE-9906:
--------------------------------------

Agreed that sleep is stupid, but without major surgery (uniqueTs, etc), and fixes to HBASE-9770,
this seems to be the best option. [~mbertozzi], [~jmhsieh] mind taking a look? Thanks. 

> Restore snapshot fails to restore the meta edits sporadically  
> ---------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HBASE-9906
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-9906
>             Project: HBase
>          Issue Type: New Feature
>          Components: snapshots
>            Reporter: Enis Soztutar
>            Assignee: Enis Soztutar
>             Fix For: 0.98.0, 0.96.1, 0.94.14
>
>         Attachments: hbase-9906_v1.patch
>
>
> After snaphot restore, we see failures to find the table in meta:
> {code}
> > disable 'tablefour'
> > restore_snapshot 'snapshot_tablefour'
> > enable 'tablefour'
> ERROR: Table tablefour does not exist.'
> {code}
> This is quite subtle. From the looks of it, we successfully restore the snapshot, do
the meta updates, return to the client about the status. The client then tries to do an operation
for the table (like enable table, or scan in the test outputs) which fails because the meta
entry for the region seems to be gone (in case of single region, the table will be reported
missing). Subsequent attempts for creating the table will also fail because the table directories
will be there, but not the meta entries.
> For restoring meta entries, we are doing a delete then a put to the same region:
> {code}
> 2013-11-04 10:39:51,582 INFO org.apache.hadoop.hbase.snapshot.RestoreSnapshotHelper:
region to restore: 76d0e2b7ec3291afcaa82e18a56ccc30
> 2013-11-04 10:39:51,582 INFO org.apache.hadoop.hbase.snapshot.RestoreSnapshotHelper:
region to remove: fa41edf43fe3ee131db4a34b848ff432
> ...
> 2013-11-04 10:39:52,102 INFO org.apache.hadoop.hbase.catalog.MetaEditor: Deleted [{ENCODED
=> fa41edf43fe3ee131db4a34b848ff432, NAME => 'tablethree_mod,,1383559723345.fa41edf43fe3ee131db4a34b848ff432.',
STARTKEY => '', ENDKEY => ''}, {ENCODED => 76d0e2b7ec3291afcaa82e18a56ccc30, NAME
=> 'tablethree_mod,,1383561123097.76d0e2b7ec3291afcaa82e18a56ccc30.', STARTKE
> 2013-11-04 10:39:52,111 INFO org.apache.hadoop.hbase.catalog.MetaEditor: Added 1
> {code}
> The root cause for this sporadic failure is that, the delete and subsequent put will
have the same timestamp if they execute in the same ms. The delete will override the put in
the same ts, even though the put have a larger ts.
> See: HBASE-9905, HBASE-8770
> Credit goes to [~huned] for reporting this bug. 



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.1#6144)

Mime
View raw message