hbase-issues mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Nicolas Liochon (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] [Commented] (HBASE-9775) Client write path perf issues
Date Thu, 07 Nov 2013 12:08:32 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-9775?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13815875#comment-13815875

Nicolas Liochon commented on HBASE-9775:

The patch is not important, this jira is a kind of umbrella, the real meat has been done on
other patches, already committed (or not committable, which leads to the same point: there
is no patch to apply :-) )
What we're testing here is the baseline, like the graphs you were doing a while ago: how .96
behaves compared to .94 with the default settings in both cases. 

Thanks, Jean-Marc.

> Client write path perf issues
> -----------------------------
>                 Key: HBASE-9775
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-9775
>             Project: HBase
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: Client
>    Affects Versions: 0.96.0
>            Reporter: Elliott Clark
>            Priority: Critical
>         Attachments: 9775.rig.txt, 9775.rig.v2.patch, 9775.rig.v3.patch, Charts Search
  Cloudera Manager - ITBLL.png, Charts Search   Cloudera Manager.png, hbase-9775.patch, job_run.log,
short_ycsb.png, ycsb.png, ycsb_insert_94_vs_96.png
> Testing on larger clusters has not had the desired throughput increases.

This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA

View raw message