Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hbase-issues-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hbase-issues-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E6D69101F1 for ; Fri, 20 Sep 2013 18:39:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 85524 invoked by uid 500); 20 Sep 2013 18:39:55 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hbase-issues-archive@hbase.apache.org Received: (qmail 85485 invoked by uid 500); 20 Sep 2013 18:39:54 -0000 Mailing-List: contact issues-help@hbase.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list issues@hbase.apache.org Received: (qmail 85464 invoked by uid 99); 20 Sep 2013 18:39:52 -0000 Received: from arcas.apache.org (HELO arcas.apache.org) (140.211.11.28) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 20 Sep 2013 18:39:52 +0000 Date: Fri, 20 Sep 2013 18:39:52 +0000 (UTC) From: "Dan Burkert (JIRA)" To: issues@hbase.apache.org Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HBASE-9576) Fixups in hbase protobuf MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-9576?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13773285#comment-13773285 ] Dan Burkert commented on HBASE-9576: ------------------------------------ Hey Stack, I could probably have a patch ready tomorrow, mid next week at the latest. I can definitely nock some of them out by tomorrow, I'll put them up. - Dan > Fixups in hbase protobuf > ------------------------ > > Key: HBASE-9576 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-9576 > Project: HBase > Issue Type: Task > Components: Protobufs > Reporter: stack > > Benoit was looking at out pbs. Had following remarks: > {code} > ...there is something that doesn't make sense to me...a MutateRequest can have a Condition...the Condition has row/family/qualifier...so for a single KV CAS, one needs to specify the...row/family/qualifier twice...once in the MutationProto and once in the Condition...not a huge deal...just weird > ...also in Comparator.proto, both BinaryComparator and BinaryPrefixComparator (and BitComparator too actually) would have been better off without ByteArrayComparable, which seems a useless pb, but no big deal either > {code} > Will keep this issue open as place to accumulate pb fixups. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira