hbase-issues mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Hadoop QA (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] [Commented] (HBASE-9588) Expose checkAndPut/checkAndDelete with comparators to HTableInterface
Date Fri, 20 Sep 2013 00:34:51 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-9588?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13772522#comment-13772522

Hadoop QA commented on HBASE-9588:

{color:red}-1 overall{color}.  Here are the results of testing the latest attachment 
  against trunk revision .

    {color:green}+1 @author{color}.  The patch does not contain any @author tags.

    {color:red}-1 tests included{color}.  The patch doesn't appear to include any new or modified
                        Please justify why no new tests are needed for this patch.
                        Also please list what manual steps were performed to verify this patch.

    {color:red}-1 patch{color}.  The patch command could not apply the patch.

Console output: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/7310//console

This message is automatically generated.
> Expose checkAndPut/checkAndDelete with comparators to HTableInterface
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>                 Key: HBASE-9588
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-9588
>             Project: HBase
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: Client
>    Affects Versions: 0.98.0
>            Reporter: Robert Roland
>         Attachments: checkAndPut_HBASE-9588_0.94.patch, checkAndPut_HBASE-9588_TRUNK.patch
> HRegionInterface allows you to specify a comparator to checkAndPut and checkAndDelete,
but that isn't available to the standard HTableInterface.
> The attached patches expose these functions to the client. It adds two methods to HTableInterface,
which required implementing in several places.
> They are not implemented in RemoteHTable - I couldn't see an obvious way to implement
there. Following the pattern of increment, batch, etc, they are "not supported."

This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

View raw message