hbase-issues mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Hadoop QA (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] [Commented] (HBASE-9508) Restore some API mistakenly removed in client, mapred*, and common
Date Wed, 11 Sep 2013 22:17:52 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-9508?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13764862#comment-13764862
] 

Hadoop QA commented on HBASE-9508:
----------------------------------

{color:red}-1 overall{color}.  Here are the results of testing the latest attachment 
  http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12602657/9508.txt
  against trunk revision .

    {color:green}+1 @author{color}.  The patch does not contain any @author tags.

    {color:red}-1 tests included{color}.  The patch doesn't appear to include any new or modified
tests.
                        Please justify why no new tests are needed for this patch.
                        Also please list what manual steps were performed to verify this patch.

    {color:red}-1 hadoop1.0{color}.  The patch failed to compile against the hadoop 1.0 profile.

Console output: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/7159//console

This message is automatically generated.
                
> Restore some API mistakenly removed in client, mapred*, and common
> ------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HBASE-9508
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-9508
>             Project: HBase
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: Usability
>            Reporter: stack
>            Assignee: stack
>            Priority: Critical
>             Fix For: 0.98.0, 0.96.0
>
>         Attachments: 9508.txt
>
>
> Here is contrib to the API compatibility story.  I went over Aleks' compatibility report
and restored removed or overriden methods and constructors, stuff that was in 0.94 non-deprecated
and removed in 0.96.
> This patch is not comprehensive because some removals cannot be restored as in those
that used take Writables (more on this later from Jon).
> The changes included here are mostly restore of methods that took a table name as a byte
array replaced by a TableName object.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

Mime
View raw message