hbase-issues mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Lars Hofhansl (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] [Commented] (HBASE-9469) Synchronous replication
Date Tue, 10 Sep 2013 04:46:57 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-9469?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13762722#comment-13762722

Lars Hofhansl commented on HBASE-9469:

I doubt We'd get reasonable performance from that. Could be an optional feature. Patches are
welcome :)

> Synchronous replication
> -----------------------
>                 Key: HBASE-9469
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-9469
>             Project: HBase
>          Issue Type: New Feature
>            Reporter: Feng Honghua
>            Priority: Minor
> Scenario: 
> A/B clusters with master-master replication, client writes to A cluster and A pushes
all writes to B cluster, and when A cluster is down, client switches writing to B cluster.
> But the client's write switch is unsafe due to the replication between A/B is asynchronous:
a delete to B cluster which aims to delete a put written earlier can fail due to that put
is written to A cluster and isn't successfully pushed to B before A is down. It can be worse
if this delete is collected(flush and then major compact occurs) before A cluster is up and
that put is eventually pushed to B, the put won't ever be deleted.
> Can we provide per-table/per-peer synchronous replication which ships the according hlog
entry of write before responsing write success to client? By this we can guarantee the client
that all write requests for which he got success response when he wrote to A cluster must
already have been in B cluster as well.

This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

View raw message