Mailing-List: contact issues-help@hbase.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Date: Mon, 12 Aug 2013 18:38:50 +0000 (UTC)
From: "Jimmy Xiang (JIRA)" <jira@apache.org>
To: issues@hbase.apache.org
Message-ID: <JIRA.12660682.1375198437039.48122.1376332730103@arcas>
In-Reply-To: <JIRA.12660682.1375198437039@arcas>
References: <JIRA.12660682.1375198437039@arcas>
Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HBASE-9088)
 TestSplitLogManager.testMultipleResubmits fails
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit


    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-9088?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13737194#comment-13737194 ] 

Jimmy Xiang commented on HBASE-9088:
------------------------------------

The addendum is in.
                
> TestSplitLogManager.testMultipleResubmits fails
> -----------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HBASE-9088
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-9088
>             Project: HBase
>          Issue Type: Bug
>            Reporter: stack
>            Assignee: Jimmy Xiang
>             Fix For: 0.98.0, 0.95.2
>
>         Attachments: trunk-9088.addendum, trunk-9088.patch
>
>
> See https://builds.apache.org/job/hbase-0.95/381/testReport/org.apache.hadoop.hbase.master/TestSplitLogManager/testMultipleResubmits/
> {code}
> ava.lang.AssertionError: expected:<2> but was:<3>
> 	at org.junit.Assert.fail(Assert.java:88)
> 	at org.junit.Assert.failNotEquals(Assert.java:743)
> 	at org.junit.Assert.assertEquals(Assert.java:118)
> 	at org.junit.Assert.assertEquals(Assert.java:555)
> 	at org.junit.Assert.assertEquals(Assert.java:542)
> 	at org.apache.hadoop.hbase.master.TestSplitLogManager.waitForCounter(TestSplitLogManager.java:167)
> 	at org.apache.hadoop.hbase.master.TestSplitLogManager.waitForCounter(TestSplitLogManager.java:153)
> 	at org.apache.hadoop.hbase.master.TestSplitLogManager.testMultipleResubmits(TestSplitLogManager.java:287)
> 	at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
> 	at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:57)
> 	at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43)
> 	at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:601)
> 	at org.junit.runners.model.FrameworkMethod$1.runReflectiveCall(FrameworkMethod.java:47)
> 	at org.junit.internal.runners.model.ReflectiveCallable.run(ReflectiveCallable.java:12)
> 	at org.junit.runners.model.FrameworkMethod.invokeExplosively(FrameworkMethod.java:44)
> 	at org.junit.internal.runners.statements.InvokeMethod.evaluate(InvokeMethod.java:17)
> 	at org.junit.internal.runners.statements.RunBefores.evaluate(RunBefores.java:26)
> 	at org.junit.internal.runners.statements.RunAfters.evaluate(RunAfters.java:27)
> 	at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.runLeaf(ParentRunner.java:271)
> 	at org.junit.runners.BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.runChild(BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.java:70)
> 	at org.junit.runners.BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.runChild(BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.java:50)
> 	at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$3.run(ParentRunner.java:238)
> 	at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$1.schedule(ParentRunner.java:63)
> 	at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.runChildren(ParentRunner.java:236)
> 	at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.access$000(ParentRunner.java:53)
> 	at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$2.evaluate(ParentRunner.java:229)
> 	at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.run(ParentRunner.java:309)
> 	at org.junit.runners.Suite.runChild(Suite.java:127)
> 	at org.junit.runners.Suite.runChild(Suite.java:26)
> 	at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$3.run(ParentRunner.java:238)
> 	at java.util.concurrent.Executors$RunnableAdapter.call(Executors.java:471)
> 	at java.util.concurrent.FutureTask$Sync.innerRun(FutureTask.java:334)
> 	at java.util.concurrent.FutureTask.run(FutureTask.java:166)
> 	at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1110)
> 	at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:603)
> 	at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:722)
> {code}
> [~jxiang] or [~jeffreyz] Is this code path even used any more?  Should I just remove this test?  Thanks.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira