hbase-issues mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Hudson (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] [Commented] (HBASE-8449) Refactor recoverLease retries and pauses informed by findings over in hbase-8389
Date Fri, 02 Aug 2013 06:13:51 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-8449?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13727382#comment-13727382
] 

Hudson commented on HBASE-8449:
-------------------------------

SUCCESS: Integrated in HBase-0.94-security #240 (See [https://builds.apache.org/job/HBase-0.94-security/240/])
HBASE-8670 [0.94] Backport HBASE-8449,HBASE-8204 and HBASE-8699 to 0.94 (Refactor recoverLease
retries and pauses) (enis: rev 1509532)
* /hbase/branches/0.94/src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/hbase/util/FSHDFSUtils.java
* /hbase/branches/0.94/src/main/resources/hbase-default.xml
* /hbase/branches/0.94/src/test/java/org/apache/hadoop/hbase/regionserver/wal/TestHLog.java
* /hbase/branches/0.94/src/test/java/org/apache/hadoop/hbase/util/TestFSHDFSUtils.java

                
> Refactor recoverLease retries and pauses informed by findings over in hbase-8389
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HBASE-8449
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-8449
>             Project: HBase
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: Filesystem Integration
>    Affects Versions: 0.94.7, 0.95.0
>            Reporter: stack
>            Assignee: stack
>            Priority: Critical
>             Fix For: 0.98.0, 0.95.1
>
>         Attachments: 8449.txt, 8449v2.txt, 8449v3.txt, 8449v4.txt, 8449v6.txt, 8449v7.txt
>
>
> HBASE-8359 is an interesting issue that roams near and far.  This issue is about making
use of the findings handily summarized on the end of hbase-8359 which have it that trunk needs
refactor around how it does its recoverLease handling (and that the patch committed against
HBASE-8359 is not what we want going forward).
> This issue is about making a patch that adds a lag between recoverLease invocations where
the lag is related to dfs timeouts -- the hdfs-side dfs timeout -- and optionally makes use
of the isFileClosed API if it is available (a facility that is not yet committed to a branch
near you and unlikely to be within your locality with a good while to come).

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

Mime
View raw message