Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hbase-issues-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hbase-issues-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 1749810F9E for ; Tue, 30 Jul 2013 03:37:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 19141 invoked by uid 500); 30 Jul 2013 03:37:54 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hbase-issues-archive@hbase.apache.org Received: (qmail 19101 invoked by uid 500); 30 Jul 2013 03:37:53 -0000 Mailing-List: contact issues-help@hbase.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list issues@hbase.apache.org Received: (qmail 18898 invoked by uid 99); 30 Jul 2013 03:37:50 -0000 Received: from arcas.apache.org (HELO arcas.apache.org) (140.211.11.28) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 30 Jul 2013 03:37:50 +0000 Date: Tue, 30 Jul 2013 03:37:50 +0000 (UTC) From: "Jimmy Xiang (JIRA)" To: issues@hbase.apache.org Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HBASE-9080) Retain assignment should be used when re-enabling table(s) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-9080?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13723356#comment-13723356 ] Jimmy Xiang commented on HBASE-9080: ------------------------------------ For 0.94, bulk assigner is not as safe as in trunk as I know. > Retain assignment should be used when re-enabling table(s) > ---------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HBASE-9080 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-9080 > Project: HBase > Issue Type: Bug > Affects Versions: 0.94.10 > Reporter: Ted Yu > Assignee: Ted Yu > Fix For: 0.94.11 > > > Region servers are picked in round robin fashion when a table is re-enabled. > This results in poor data locality. > We should use retain assignment when re-enabling table(s). > For initial discussion, see HBASE-6143 > Since patches for 0.94 and trunk may turn out to be very different, this JIRA is for fixing the issue in 0.94 branch. > Thanks Lars, Elliot, Vladmir and Stack for providing opinions on this subject. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira