Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hbase-issues-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hbase-issues-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 9782F10E0E for ; Sat, 20 Jul 2013 05:12:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 20201 invoked by uid 500); 20 Jul 2013 05:12:56 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hbase-issues-archive@hbase.apache.org Received: (qmail 20139 invoked by uid 500); 20 Jul 2013 05:12:55 -0000 Mailing-List: contact issues-help@hbase.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list issues@hbase.apache.org Received: (qmail 20035 invoked by uid 99); 20 Jul 2013 05:12:52 -0000 Received: from arcas.apache.org (HELO arcas.apache.org) (140.211.11.28) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 20 Jul 2013 05:12:52 +0000 Date: Sat, 20 Jul 2013 05:12:52 +0000 (UTC) From: "Lars Hofhansl (JIRA)" To: issues@hbase.apache.org Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Subject: [jira] [Comment Edited] (HBASE-8778) Region assigments scan table directory making them slow for huge tables MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-8778?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13714336#comment-13714336 ] Lars Hofhansl edited comment on HBASE-8778 at 7/20/13 5:12 AM: --------------------------------------------------------------- Skimmed the patch. Looks OK. Will do a closer soon. \+1 on doing the known-subdir approach in 0.94 and a tables-table in 0.96+. Could you run the full test suite with the patch attached? Have you been using this patch in any production environment, yet? was (Author: lhofhansl): Skimmed the patch. Looks OK. Will do a closer soon. +1 on doing the known-subdir approach in 0.94 and a tables-table in 0.96+. Could you run the full test suite with the patch attached? Have you been using this patch in any production environment, yet? > Region assigments scan table directory making them slow for huge tables > ----------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HBASE-8778 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-8778 > Project: HBase > Issue Type: Improvement > Reporter: Dave Latham > Assignee: Dave Latham > Fix For: 0.98.0, 0.95.2, 0.94.11 > > Attachments: HBASE-8778-0.94.5.patch, HBASE-8778-0.94.5-v2.patch > > > On a table with 130k regions it takes about 3 seconds for a region server to open a region once it has been assigned. > Watching the threads for a region server running 0.94.5 that is opening many such regions shows the thread opening the reigon in code like this: > {noformat} > "PRI IPC Server handler 4 on 60020" daemon prio=10 tid=0x00002aaac07e9000 nid=0x6566 runnable [0x000000004c46d000] > java.lang.Thread.State: RUNNABLE > at java.lang.String.indexOf(String.java:1521) > at java.net.URI$Parser.scan(URI.java:2912) > at java.net.URI$Parser.parse(URI.java:3004) > at java.net.URI.(URI.java:736) > at org.apache.hadoop.fs.Path.initialize(Path.java:145) > at org.apache.hadoop.fs.Path.(Path.java:126) > at org.apache.hadoop.fs.Path.(Path.java:50) > at org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.protocol.HdfsFileStatus.getFullPath(HdfsFileStatus.java:215) > at org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.DistributedFileSystem.makeQualified(DistributedFileSystem.java:252) > at org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.DistributedFileSystem.listStatus(DistributedFileSystem.java:311) > at org.apache.hadoop.fs.FilterFileSystem.listStatus(FilterFileSystem.java:159) > at org.apache.hadoop.fs.FileSystem.listStatus(FileSystem.java:842) > at org.apache.hadoop.fs.FileSystem.listStatus(FileSystem.java:867) > at org.apache.hadoop.hbase.util.FSUtils.listStatus(FSUtils.java:1168) > at org.apache.hadoop.hbase.util.FSTableDescriptors.getTableInfoPath(FSTableDescriptors.java:269) > at org.apache.hadoop.hbase.util.FSTableDescriptors.getTableInfoPath(FSTableDescriptors.java:255) > at org.apache.hadoop.hbase.util.FSTableDescriptors.getTableInfoModtime(FSTableDescriptors.java:368) > at org.apache.hadoop.hbase.util.FSTableDescriptors.get(FSTableDescriptors.java:155) > at org.apache.hadoop.hbase.util.FSTableDescriptors.get(FSTableDescriptors.java:126) > at org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver.HRegionServer.openRegion(HRegionServer.java:2834) > at org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver.HRegionServer.openRegion(HRegionServer.java:2807) > at sun.reflect.GeneratedMethodAccessor64.invoke(Unknown Source) > at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:25) > at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:597) > at org.apache.hadoop.hbase.ipc.WritableRpcEngine$Server.call(WritableRpcEngine.java:320) > at org.apache.hadoop.hbase.ipc.HBaseServer$Handler.run(HBaseServer.java:1426) > {noformat} > To open the region, the region server first loads the latest HTableDescriptor. Since HBASE-4553 HTableDescriptor's are stored in the file system at "/hbase//.tableinfo.". The file with the largest sequenceNum is the current descriptor. This is done so that the current descirptor is updated atomically. However, since the filename is not known in advance FSTableDescriptors it has to do a FileSystem.listStatus operation which has to list all files in the directory to find it. The directory also contains all the region directories, so in our case it has to load 130k FileStatus objects. Even using a globStatus matching function still transfers all the objects to the client before performing the pattern matching. Furthermore HDFS uses a default of transferring 1000 directory entries in each RPC call, so it requires 130 roundtrips to the namenode to fetch all the directory entries. > Consequently, to reassign all the regions of a table (or a constant fraction thereof) requires time proportional to the square of the number of regions. > In our case, if a region server fails with 200 such regions, it takes 10+ minutes for them all to be reassigned, after the zk expiration and log splitting. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira