hbase-issues mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "stack (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] [Commented] (HBASE-4955) Use the official versions of surefire & junit
Date Sun, 21 Jul 2013 04:52:48 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-4955?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13714641#comment-13714641
] 

stack commented on HBASE-4955:
------------------------------

Related, I am into a new domain of failures.  The zombie script found a few but it maybe that
zombies are inevitable up on apache as sometimes the load is VERY high -- up in the hundreds
-- and I see that we can also be up against the file limits (4k on some machines).  Besides
zombies, there are fails where the zombie trap has nothing in it and "all" tests fail (it
looks like some tests just don't show in the list... these are the ones I am looking at).
 Maybe a new surefire would at least list these problematic tests?  E.g. http://54.241.6.143/job/HBase-0.95/661/testReport/
 (Clues for how to debug these failing tests appreciated).
                
> Use the official versions of surefire & junit
> ---------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HBASE-4955
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-4955
>             Project: HBase
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: test
>    Affects Versions: 0.94.0
>         Environment: all
>            Reporter: Nicolas Liochon
>            Assignee: Nicolas Liochon
>            Priority: Critical
>         Attachments: 4955.v1.patch, 4955.v2.patch, 4955.v2.patch, 4955.v2.patch, 4955.v2.patch,
4955.v3.patch, 4955.v3.patch, 4955.v3.patch, 4955.v4.patch, 4955.v4.patch, 4955.v4.patch,
4955.v4.patch, 4955.v4.patch, 4955.v4.patch, 4955.v5.patch, 4955.v6.patch, 8204.v4.patch
>
>
> We currently use private versions for Surefire & JUnit since HBASE-4763.
> This JIRA traks what we need to move to official versions.
> Surefire 2.11 is just out, but, after some tests, it does not contain all what we need.
> JUnit. Could be for JUnit 4.11. Issue to monitor:
> https://github.com/KentBeck/junit/issues/359: fixed in our version, no feedback for an
integration on trunk
> Surefire: Could be for Surefire 2.12. Issues to monitor are:
> 329 (category support): fixed, we use the official implementation from the trunk
> 786 (@Category with forkMode=always): fixed, we use the official implementation from
the trunk
> 791 (incorrect elapsed time on test failure): fixed, we use the official implementation
from the trunk
> 793 (incorrect time in the XML report): Not fixed (reopen) on trunk, fixed on our version.
> 760 (does not take into account the test method): fixed in trunk, not fixed in our version
> 798 (print immediately the test class name): not fixed in trunk, not fixed in our version
> 799 (Allow test parallelization when forkMode=always): not fixed in trunk, not fixed
in our version
> 800 (redirectTestOutputToFile not taken into account): not yet fix on trunk, fixed on
our version
> 800 & 793 are the more important to monitor, it's the only ones that are fixed in
our version but not on trunk.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

Mime
View raw message