Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hbase-issues-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hbase-issues-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 59C9A10D2B for ; Wed, 19 Jun 2013 08:56:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 2247 invoked by uid 500); 19 Jun 2013 08:56:21 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hbase-issues-archive@hbase.apache.org Received: (qmail 2190 invoked by uid 500); 19 Jun 2013 08:56:21 -0000 Mailing-List: contact issues-help@hbase.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list issues@hbase.apache.org Received: (qmail 2158 invoked by uid 99); 19 Jun 2013 08:56:20 -0000 Received: from arcas.apache.org (HELO arcas.apache.org) (140.211.11.28) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 19 Jun 2013 08:56:20 +0000 Date: Wed, 19 Jun 2013 08:56:20 +0000 (UTC) From: "Lars Hofhansl (JIRA)" To: issues@hbase.apache.org Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HBASE-7404) Bucket Cache:A solution about CMS,Heap Fragment and Big Cache on HBASE MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-7404?page=3Dcom.atlassian= .jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=3D1368= 7793#comment-13687793 ]=20 Lars Hofhansl commented on HBASE-7404: -------------------------------------- [~siyu_828] Did you ever redo your test? Did you still find it is slower? =20 > Bucket Cache:A solution about CMS,Heap Fragment and Big Cache on HBASE > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HBASE-7404 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-7404 > Project: HBase > Issue Type: New Feature > Affects Versions: 0.94.3 > Reporter: chunhui shen > Assignee: chunhui shen > Fix For: 0.95.0 > > Attachments: 7404-trunk-v10.patch, 7404-trunk-v11.patch, 7404-tru= nk-v12.patch, 7404-trunk-v13.patch, 7404-trunk-v13.txt, 7404-trunk-v14.patc= h, BucketCache.pdf, hbase-7404-94v2.patch, HBASE-7404-backport-0.94.patch, = hbase-7404-trunkv2.patch, hbase-7404-trunkv9.patch, Introduction of Bucket = Cache.pdf > > > First, thanks @neil from Fusion-IO share the source code. > Usage: > 1.Use bucket cache as main memory cache, configured as the following: > =E2=80=93"hbase.bucketcache.ioengine" "heap" > =E2=80=93"hbase.bucketcache.size" 0.4 (size for bucket cache, 0.4 is a pe= rcentage of max heap size) > 2.Use bucket cache as a secondary cache, configured as the following: > =E2=80=93"hbase.bucketcache.ioengine" "file:/disk1/hbase/cache.data"(The = file path where to store the block data) > =E2=80=93"hbase.bucketcache.size" 1024 (size for bucket cache, unit is MB= , so 1024 means 1GB) > =E2=80=93"hbase.bucketcache.combinedcache.enabled" false (default value b= eing true) > See more configurations from org.apache.hadoop.hbase.io.hfile.CacheConfig= and org.apache.hadoop.hbase.io.hfile.bucket.BucketCache > What's Bucket Cache?=20 > It could greatly decrease CMS and heap fragment by GC > It support a large cache space for High Read Performance by using high sp= eed disk like Fusion-io > 1.An implementation of block cache like LruBlockCache > 2.Self manage blocks' storage position through Bucket Allocator > 3.The cached blocks could be stored in the memory or file system > 4.Bucket Cache could be used as a mainly block cache(see CombinedBlockCac= he), combined with LruBlockCache to decrease CMS and fragment by GC. > 5.BucketCache also could be used as a secondary cache(e.g. using Fusionio= to store block) to enlarge cache space > How about SlabCache? > We have studied and test SlabCache first, but the result is bad, because: > 1.SlabCache use SingleSizeCache, its use ratio of memory is low because k= inds of block size, especially using DataBlockEncoding > 2.SlabCache is uesd in DoubleBlockCache, block is cached both in SlabCach= e and LruBlockCache, put the block to LruBlockCache again if hit in SlabCac= he , it causes CMS and heap fragment don't get any better > 3.Direct heap performance is not good as heap, and maybe cause OOM, so we= recommend using "heap" engine=20 > See more in the attachment and in the patch -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrato= rs For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira