Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hbase-issues-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hbase-issues-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id CB6A5DECD for ; Thu, 23 May 2013 12:00:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 43173 invoked by uid 500); 23 May 2013 12:00:24 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hbase-issues-archive@hbase.apache.org Received: (qmail 42914 invoked by uid 500); 23 May 2013 12:00:24 -0000 Mailing-List: contact issues-help@hbase.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list issues@hbase.apache.org Received: (qmail 42855 invoked by uid 99); 23 May 2013 12:00:23 -0000 Received: from arcas.apache.org (HELO arcas.apache.org) (140.211.11.28) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 23 May 2013 12:00:23 +0000 Date: Thu, 23 May 2013 12:00:23 +0000 (UTC) From: "Liang Xie (JIRA)" To: issues@hbase.apache.org Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HBASE-4811) Support reverse Scan MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-4811?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Liang Xie updated HBASE-4811: ----------------------------- Attachment: HBase-4811-0.94-v2.txt a tentative rebase against 0.94 branch(it passed runAllTests in our internal 0.94.3 codebase) > Support reverse Scan > -------------------- > > Key: HBASE-4811 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-4811 > Project: HBase > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: Client > Affects Versions: 0.20.6 > Reporter: John Carrino > Attachments: HBase-4811-0.94.3modified.txt, HBase-4811-0.94-v2.txt > > > All the documentation I find about HBase says that if you want forward and reverse scans you should just build 2 tables and one be ascending and one descending. Is there a fundamental reason that HBase only supports forward Scan? It seems like a lot of extra space overhead and coding overhead (to keep them in sync) to support 2 tables. > I am assuming this has been discussed before, but I can't find the discussions anywhere about it or why it would be infeasible. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira