hbase-issues mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "stack (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] [Commented] (HBASE-8535) Test for zk leak does not account for unsynchronized access to zk watcher
Date Wed, 15 May 2013 18:49:16 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-8535?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13658660#comment-13658660
] 

stack commented on HBASE-8535:
------------------------------

[~ericyu] Does the test make sense?  Deleting a 'stale' connection though it is in use?  And
why no protection against a stale delete coming in on a connection in use?  I was going to
look at this...
                
> Test for zk leak does not account for unsynchronized access to zk watcher
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HBASE-8535
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-8535
>             Project: HBase
>          Issue Type: Test
>          Components: Client
>    Affects Versions: 0.98.0, 0.95.1
>            Reporter: Eric Yu
>            Assignee: stack
>             Fix For: 0.98.0, 0.95.1
>
>         Attachments: HBASE-8535.patch
>
>
> Test can detect a live zk connection in a closed hconnection because it does not accesses
the zk watcher in a synchronized manner. 

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

Mime
View raw message