hbase-issues mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Hadoop QA (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] [Commented] (HBASE-8336) PooledHTable may be returned multiple times to the same pool
Date Tue, 21 May 2013 15:09:16 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-8336?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13663045#comment-13663045

Hadoop QA commented on HBASE-8336:

{color:red}-1 overall{color}.  Here are the results of testing the latest attachment 
  against trunk revision .

    {color:green}+1 @author{color}.  The patch does not contain any @author tags.

    {color:green}+1 tests included{color}.  The patch appears to include 3 new or modified

    {color:green}+1 hadoop1.0{color}.  The patch compiles against the hadoop 1.0 profile.

    {color:green}+1 hadoop2.0{color}.  The patch compiles against the hadoop 2.0 profile.

    {color:green}+1 javadoc{color}.  The javadoc tool did not generate any warning messages.

    {color:green}+1 javac{color}.  The applied patch does not increase the total number of
javac compiler warnings.

    {color:green}+1 findbugs{color}.  The patch does not introduce any new Findbugs (version
1.3.9) warnings.

    {color:green}+1 release audit{color}.  The applied patch does not increase the total number
of release audit warnings.

    {color:green}+1 lineLengths{color}.  The patch does not introduce lines longer than 100

  {color:green}+1 site{color}.  The mvn site goal succeeds with this patch.

     {color:red}-1 core tests{color}.  The patch failed these unit tests:

Test results: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/5771//testReport/
Findbugs warnings: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/5771//artifact/trunk/patchprocess/newPatchFindbugsWarningshbase-protocol.html
Findbugs warnings: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/5771//artifact/trunk/patchprocess/newPatchFindbugsWarningshbase-client.html
Findbugs warnings: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/5771//artifact/trunk/patchprocess/newPatchFindbugsWarningshbase-examples.html
Findbugs warnings: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/5771//artifact/trunk/patchprocess/newPatchFindbugsWarningshbase-hadoop1-compat.html
Findbugs warnings: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/5771//artifact/trunk/patchprocess/newPatchFindbugsWarningshbase-prefix-tree.html
Findbugs warnings: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/5771//artifact/trunk/patchprocess/newPatchFindbugsWarningshbase-common.html
Findbugs warnings: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/5771//artifact/trunk/patchprocess/newPatchFindbugsWarningshbase-server.html
Findbugs warnings: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/5771//artifact/trunk/patchprocess/newPatchFindbugsWarningshbase-hadoop-compat.html
Console output: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/5771//console

This message is automatically generated.
> PooledHTable may be returned multiple times to the same pool
> ------------------------------------------------------------
>                 Key: HBASE-8336
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-8336
>             Project: HBase
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: Client
>    Affects Versions: 0.95.0
>            Reporter: Nikolai Grigoriev
>            Priority: Minor
>         Attachments: HBASE-8336_1.patch
> I have recently observed a very strange issue with an application using HBase and HTablePool.
After an investigation I have found that the root cause was the piece of code that was calling
close() twice on the same HTableInterface instance retrieved from HTablePool (created with
default policy).
> A closer look at the code revealed that PooledHTable.close() calls returnTable(), which,
in turn, places the table back into the QUEUE of the pooled tables. No checking of any kind
is done so it is possible to call it multiple times and place multiple references to the same
HTable into the same pool.
> This creates a number  of negative effects:
> - pool grows on each close() call and eventually gets filled up with the references to
the same HTable. From this moment the pool stops working as pool.
> - multiple callers will get the same instance of HTable while expecting to have unique
> - once the pool is full, next call to close() will result to the call to the real close()
method of HTable. This will make HTable unusable as close() call may shutdown() the internal
thread pool. From this moment other attempts to use this HTable will fail with RejectedExecutionException.
And since the HTablePool will have additional references to that HTable, other users of the
pool will just start failing on any call that leads to flushCommits()
> The problem was, obviously, triggered by bad code on our side. But I think the pool has
to be protected. Probably the best way to fix it would be to implement a flag in PooledHTable
that represent its state (leased/returned) and once close() is called, it would be "returned".
From this moment any operations on this PooledHTable would result in something like IllegalStateException.

This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

View raw message