Mailing-List: contact issues-help@hbase.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Date: Wed, 3 Apr 2013 01:57:15 +0000 (UTC)
From: "Enis Soztutar (JIRA)" <jira@apache.org>
To: issues@hbase.apache.org
Message-ID: <JIRA.12639496.1364430259101.96213.1364954235558@arcas>
In-Reply-To: <JIRA.12639496.1364430259101@arcas>
References: <JIRA.12639496.1364430259101@arcas>
Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HBASE-8208) Data could not be replicated to
 slaves when deferredLogSync is enabled
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit


    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-8208?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13620508#comment-13620508 ] 

Enis Soztutar commented on HBASE-8208:
--------------------------------------

bq. Will we get a "sync storm" when we have a lot of column families?
We do sync per region, not per store as far as I can read the patch. 
                
> Data could not be replicated to slaves when deferredLogSync is enabled
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HBASE-8208
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-8208
>             Project: HBase
>          Issue Type: Bug
>    Affects Versions: 0.95.0, 0.98.0, 0.94.6
>            Reporter: Jeffrey Zhong
>            Assignee: Jeffrey Zhong
>             Fix For: 0.95.0, 0.98.0, 0.94.7
>
>         Attachments: hbase-8208.patch, hbase-8208-v1.patch, hbase-8208_v2.patch
>
>
> This is a subtle issue. When deferredLogSync is enabled, there are chances we could flush data before syncing all HLog entries. Assuming we just flush the internal cache and the server dies with some unsynced hlog entries. 
> Data is not lost at the source cluster while replication is based on WAL files and some changes we flushed at the source won't be replicated the slave clusters. 
> Although enabling deferredLogSync with tolerances of data loss, it breaks the replication assumption that whatever persisted in the source should be replicated to its slave clusters. 
> In short, the slave cluster could end up with double losses: the data loss in the source and some data stored in source cluster may not be replicated to slaves either.
> The fix of the issue isn't hard. Basically we can invoke sync during each flush when replication is enabled for a region server. Since sync returns immediately when nothing to sync so there should be no performance impact.
> Please let me know what you think!
> Thanks,
> -Jeffrey

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira