hbase-issues mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Lars Hofhansl (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] [Commented] (HBASE-8208) Data could not be replicated to slaves when deferredLogSync is enabled
Date Thu, 04 Apr 2013 04:23:17 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-8208?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13621750#comment-13621750
] 

Lars Hofhansl commented on HBASE-8208:
--------------------------------------

Thanks for explaining (sorry I am having very little ATM to actually look at patches in detail).

+1 I'll commit unless I hear objections.
                
> Data could not be replicated to slaves when deferredLogSync is enabled
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HBASE-8208
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-8208
>             Project: HBase
>          Issue Type: Bug
>    Affects Versions: 0.95.0, 0.98.0, 0.94.6
>            Reporter: Jeffrey Zhong
>            Assignee: Jeffrey Zhong
>             Fix For: 0.95.1, 0.98.0, 0.94.7
>
>         Attachments: hbase-8208.patch, hbase-8208-v1.patch, hbase-8208_v2.patch
>
>
> This is a subtle issue. When deferredLogSync is enabled, there are chances we could flush
data before syncing all HLog entries. Assuming we just flush the internal cache and the server
dies with some unsynced hlog entries. 
> Data is not lost at the source cluster while replication is based on WAL files and some
changes we flushed at the source won't be replicated the slave clusters. 
> Although enabling deferredLogSync with tolerances of data loss, it breaks the replication
assumption that whatever persisted in the source should be replicated to its slave clusters.

> In short, the slave cluster could end up with double losses: the data loss in the source
and some data stored in source cluster may not be replicated to slaves either.
> The fix of the issue isn't hard. Basically we can invoke sync during each flush when
replication is enabled for a region server. Since sync returns immediately when nothing to
sync so there should be no performance impact.
> Please let me know what you think!
> Thanks,
> -Jeffrey

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

Mime
View raw message