Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hbase-issues-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hbase-issues-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id DC0FCFC3F for ; Tue, 26 Mar 2013 04:39:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 18455 invoked by uid 500); 26 Mar 2013 04:39:16 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hbase-issues-archive@hbase.apache.org Received: (qmail 18413 invoked by uid 500); 26 Mar 2013 04:39:16 -0000 Mailing-List: contact issues-help@hbase.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list issues@hbase.apache.org Received: (qmail 18397 invoked by uid 99); 26 Mar 2013 04:39:16 -0000 Received: from arcas.apache.org (HELO arcas.apache.org) (140.211.11.28) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 26 Mar 2013 04:39:16 +0000 Date: Tue, 26 Mar 2013 04:39:16 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hadoop QA (JIRA)" To: issues@hbase.apache.org Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HBASE-8192) wrong logic in HRegion.bulkLoadHFiles(List) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-8192?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13613485#comment-13613485 ] Hadoop QA commented on HBASE-8192: ---------------------------------- {color:red}-1 overall{color}. Here are the results of testing the latest attachment http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12575461/8192.txt against trunk revision . {color:green}+1 @author{color}. The patch does not contain any @author tags. {color:red}-1 tests included{color}. The patch doesn't appear to include any new or modified tests. Please justify why no new tests are needed for this patch. Also please list what manual steps were performed to verify this patch. {color:green}+1 hadoop2.0{color}. The patch compiles against the hadoop 2.0 profile. {color:green}+1 javadoc{color}. The javadoc tool did not generate any warning messages. {color:green}+1 javac{color}. The applied patch does not increase the total number of javac compiler warnings. {color:green}+1 findbugs{color}. The patch does not introduce any new Findbugs (version 1.3.9) warnings. {color:green}+1 release audit{color}. The applied patch does not increase the total number of release audit warnings. {color:green}+1 lineLengths{color}. The patch does not introduce lines longer than 100 {color:red}-1 site{color}. The patch appears to cause mvn site goal to fail. {color:red}-1 core tests{color}. The patch failed these unit tests: org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver.wal.TestHLog org.apache.hadoop.hbase.io.encoding.TestChangingEncoding Test results: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/5013//testReport/ Findbugs warnings: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/5013//artifact/trunk/patchprocess/newPatchFindbugsWarningshbase-client.html Findbugs warnings: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/5013//artifact/trunk/patchprocess/newPatchFindbugsWarningshbase-examples.html Findbugs warnings: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/5013//artifact/trunk/patchprocess/newPatchFindbugsWarningshbase-protocol.html Findbugs warnings: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/5013//artifact/trunk/patchprocess/newPatchFindbugsWarningshbase-hadoop1-compat.html Findbugs warnings: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/5013//artifact/trunk/patchprocess/newPatchFindbugsWarningshbase-prefix-tree.html Findbugs warnings: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/5013//artifact/trunk/patchprocess/newPatchFindbugsWarningshbase-common.html Findbugs warnings: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/5013//artifact/trunk/patchprocess/newPatchFindbugsWarningshbase-hadoop-compat.html Findbugs warnings: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/5013//artifact/trunk/patchprocess/newPatchFindbugsWarningshbase-server.html Console output: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/5013//console This message is automatically generated. > wrong logic in HRegion.bulkLoadHFiles(List) > ------------------------------------------- > > Key: HBASE-8192 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-8192 > Project: HBase > Issue Type: Bug > Components: regionserver > Affects Versions: 0.94.1, 0.94.2, 0.94.3, 0.94.4, 0.94.5 > Reporter: Chenghao Jiang > Labels: patch > Fix For: 0.94.7 > > Attachments: 8192.txt > > > the wrong logic is here: > when a ColumnFamily does not exist, it gets a null store object, then ioes.add(ioe); failures.add(p) > but the code below, if (failures.size() != 0), it prints a warn log and return false, so it will never go into the code if (ioes.size() != 0) below, and IOException will not be thrown, then the client will keep retry forever. > there is the same situation when doing store.assertBulkLoadHFileOk, if any WrongRegionException is caught and failures.add(p), then all the other IOException thrown by assertBulkLoadHFileOk will be ignored. > so i think if (failures.size() != 0) {} should be dealt with after if (ioes.size() !=0) {} > {code} > for (Pair p : familyPaths) { > byte[] familyName = p.getFirst(); > String path = p.getSecond(); > Store store = getStore(familyName); > if (store == null) { > IOException ioe = new DoNotRetryIOException( > "No such column family " + Bytes.toStringBinary(familyName)); > ioes.add(ioe); > failures.add(p); > } else { > try { > store.assertBulkLoadHFileOk(new Path(path)); > } catch (WrongRegionException wre) { > // recoverable (file doesn't fit in region) > failures.add(p); > } catch (IOException ioe) { > // unrecoverable (hdfs problem) > ioes.add(ioe); > } > } > } > // validation failed, bail out before doing anything permanent. > if (failures.size() != 0) { > StringBuilder list = new StringBuilder(); > for (Pair p : failures) { > list.append("\n").append(Bytes.toString(p.getFirst())).append(" : ") > .append(p.getSecond()); > } > // problem when validating > LOG.warn("There was a recoverable bulk load failure likely due to a" + > " split. These (family, HFile) pairs were not loaded: " + list); > return false; > } > // validation failed because of some sort of IO problem. > if (ioes.size() != 0) { > LOG.error("There were IO errors when checking if bulk load is ok. " + > "throwing exception!"); > throw MultipleIOException.createIOException(ioes); > } > {code} -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira