Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hbase-issues-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hbase-issues-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A0601FAB4 for ; Tue, 19 Mar 2013 21:27:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 95976 invoked by uid 500); 19 Mar 2013 21:27:16 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hbase-issues-archive@hbase.apache.org Received: (qmail 95945 invoked by uid 500); 19 Mar 2013 21:27:16 -0000 Mailing-List: contact issues-help@hbase.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list issues@hbase.apache.org Received: (qmail 95936 invoked by uid 99); 19 Mar 2013 21:27:16 -0000 Received: from arcas.apache.org (HELO arcas.apache.org) (140.211.11.28) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 19 Mar 2013 21:27:16 +0000 Date: Tue, 19 Mar 2013 21:27:16 +0000 (UTC) From: "stack (JIRA)" To: issues@hbase.apache.org Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HBASE-7842) Add compaction policy that explores more storefile groups MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-7842?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13606849#comment-13606849 ] stack commented on HBASE-7842: ------------------------------ [~eclark] See [~sershe]'s note above. > Add compaction policy that explores more storefile groups > --------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HBASE-7842 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-7842 > Project: HBase > Issue Type: New Feature > Components: Compaction > Reporter: Elliott Clark > Assignee: Elliott Clark > Attachments: HBASE-7842-0.patch, HBASE-7842-2.patch, HBASE-7842-3.patch, HBASE-7842-4.patch > > > Some workloads that are not as stable can have compactions that are too large or too small using the current storefile selection algorithm. > Currently: > * Find the first file that Size(fi) <= Sum(0, i-1, FileSize(fx)) > * Ensure that there are the min number of files (if there aren't then bail out) > * If there are too many files keep the larger ones. > I would propose something like: > * Find all sets of storefiles where every file satisfies > ** FileSize(fi) <= Sum(0, i-1, FileSize(fx)) > ** Num files in set =< max > ** Num Files in set >= min > * Then pick the set of files that maximizes ((# storefiles in set) / Sum(FileSize(fx))) > The thinking is that the above algorithm is pretty easy reason about, all files satisfy the ratio, and should rewrite the least amount of data to get the biggest impact in seeks. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira