Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hbase-issues-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hbase-issues-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id AD30EEB83 for ; Wed, 6 Mar 2013 19:26:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 6973 invoked by uid 500); 6 Mar 2013 19:26:16 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hbase-issues-archive@hbase.apache.org Received: (qmail 6934 invoked by uid 500); 6 Mar 2013 19:26:16 -0000 Mailing-List: contact issues-help@hbase.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list issues@hbase.apache.org Received: (qmail 6925 invoked by uid 99); 6 Mar 2013 19:26:16 -0000 Received: from arcas.apache.org (HELO arcas.apache.org) (140.211.11.28) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 06 Mar 2013 19:26:16 +0000 Date: Wed, 6 Mar 2013 19:26:16 +0000 (UTC) From: "Lars Hofhansl (JIRA)" To: issues@hbase.apache.org Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HBASE-7403) Online Merge MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-7403?page=3Dcom.atlassian= .jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=3D1359= 5007#comment-13595007 ]=20 Lars Hofhansl commented on HBASE-7403: -------------------------------------- Let's prove this out in trunk first. Then we can make separate decisions ab= out other release. 0.90 and 0.92 are out of the question (imho), so might 0.94 (as this needs = a lot of other plumbing - table locks, atomic META updates, etc) =20 > Online Merge > ------------ > > Key: HBASE-7403 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-7403 > Project: HBase > Issue Type: New Feature > Affects Versions: 0.95.0, 0.94.6 > Reporter: chunhui shen > Assignee: chunhui shen > Priority: Critical > Fix For: 0.95.0 > > Attachments: 7403-trunkv5.patch, 7403-trunkv6.patch, 7403v5.diff,= 7403-v5.txt, 7403v5.txt, hbase-7403-94v1.patch, hbase-7403-trunkv10.patch,= hbase-7403-trunkv11.patch, hbase-7403-trunkv12.patch, hbase-7403-trunkv13.= patch, hbase-7403-trunkv14.patch, hbase-7403-trunkv15.patch, hbase-7403-tru= nkv16.patch, hbase-7403-trunkv1.patch, hbase-7403-trunkv5.patch, hbase-7403= -trunkv6.patch, hbase-7403-trunkv7.patch, hbase-7403-trunkv8.patch, hbase-7= 403-trunkv9.patch, merge region.pdf > > > The feature of this online merge: > 1.Online,no necessary to disable table > 2.Less change for current code, could applied in trunk,0.94 or 0.92,0.90 > 3.Easy to call merege request, no need to input a long region name, only = encoded name enough > 4.No limit when operation, you don't need to tabke care the events like S= erver Dead, Balance, Split, Disabing/Enabing table, no need to take care wh= ether you send a wrong merge request, it has alread done for you > 5.Only little offline time for two merging regions > Usage: > 1.Tool: =20 > bin/hbase org.apache.hadoop.hbase.util.OnlineMerge [-force] [-async] [-sh= ow] > 2.API: static void MergeManager#createMergeRequest > We need merge in the following cases=EF=BC=9A > 1.Region hole or region overlap, can=E2=80=99t be fix by hbck > 2.Region become empty because of TTL and not reasonable Rowkey design > 3.Region is always empty or very small because of presplit when create ta= ble > 4.Too many empty or small regions would reduce the system performance(e.g= . mslab) > Current merge tools only support offline and are not able to redo if exce= ption is thrown in the process of merging, causing a dirty data > For online system, we need a online merge. > This implement logic of this patch for Online Merge is : > For example, merge regionA and regionB into regionC > 1.Offline the two regions A and B > 2.Merge the two regions in the HDFS(Create regionC=E2=80=99s directory, m= ove regionA=E2=80=99s and regionB=E2=80=99s file to regionC=E2=80=99s direc= tory, delete regionA=E2=80=99s and regionB=E2=80=99s directory) > 3.Add the merged regionC to .META. > 4.Assign the merged regionC > As design of this patch , once we do the merge work in the HDFS,we could = redo it until successful if it throws exception or abort or server restart,= but couldn=E2=80=99t be rolled back.=20 > It depends on > Use zookeeper to record the transaction journal state, make redo easier > Use zookeeper to send/receive merge request > Merge transaction is executed on the master > Support calling merge request through API or shell tool > About the merge process, please see the attachment and patch -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrato= rs For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira