hbase-issues mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Ted Yu (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] [Commented] (HBASE-3171) Drop ROOT and instead store META location(s) directly in ZooKeeper
Date Fri, 08 Mar 2013 05:26:13 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-3171?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13596846#comment-13596846

Ted Yu commented on HBASE-3171:

>From https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/4722/consoleFull, one test hung
"pool-1-thread-1" prio=10 tid=0x77002400 nid=0x38bf sleeping[0x77466000]
   java.lang.Thread.State: TIMED_WAITING (sleeping)
	at java.lang.Thread.sleep(Native Method)
	at org.apache.hadoop.hbase.TestDrainingServer.waitForAllRegionsOnline(TestDrainingServer.java:268)
	at org.apache.hadoop.hbase.TestDrainingServer.setUpBeforeClass(TestDrainingServer.java:81)
> Drop ROOT and instead store META location(s) directly in ZooKeeper
> ------------------------------------------------------------------
>                 Key: HBASE-3171
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-3171
>             Project: HBase
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: Client, master, regionserver, Zookeeper
>            Reporter: Jonathan Gray
>         Attachments: HBASE-3171.patch, HBASE-3171-v2.patch, HBASE-3171-v3.patch, HBASE-3171-v4.patch,
HBASE-3171-v5.patch, HBASE-3171-v6.patch, HBASE-3171-v7.patch
> Rather than storing the ROOT region location in ZooKeeper, going to ROOT, and reading
the META location, we should just store the META location directly in ZooKeeper.
> The purpose of the root region from the bigtable paper was to support multiple meta regions.
 Currently, we explicitly only support a single meta region, so the translation from our current
code of a single root location to a single meta location will be very simple.  Long-term,
it seems reasonable that we could store several meta region locations in ZK.  There's been
some discussion in HBASE-1755 about actually moving META into ZK, but I think this jira is
a good step towards taking some of the complexity out of how we have to deal with catalog
tables everywhere.
> As-is, a new client already requires ZK to get the root location, so this would not change
those requirements in any way.
> The primary motivation for this is to simplify things like CatalogTracker.  The way we
can handle root in that class is really simple but the tracking of meta is difficulty and
a bit hacky.  This hack on tracking of the meta location is what caused one of the bugs over
in HBASE-3159.

This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

View raw message