Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hbase-issues-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hbase-issues-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 48851E666 for ; Mon, 18 Feb 2013 01:16:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 45119 invoked by uid 500); 18 Feb 2013 01:16:12 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hbase-issues-archive@hbase.apache.org Received: (qmail 45058 invoked by uid 500); 18 Feb 2013 01:16:12 -0000 Mailing-List: contact issues-help@hbase.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list issues@hbase.apache.org Received: (qmail 45049 invoked by uid 99); 18 Feb 2013 01:16:12 -0000 Received: from arcas.apache.org (HELO arcas.apache.org) (140.211.11.28) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 18 Feb 2013 01:16:12 +0000 Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2013 01:16:12 +0000 (UTC) From: "Lars Hofhansl (JIRA)" To: issues@hbase.apache.org Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HBASE-7868) HFile performance regression between 0.92 and 0.94 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-7868?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13580355#comment-13580355 ] Lars Hofhansl commented on HBASE-7868: -------------------------------------- Did the same scan test with cacheBlocks disabled for the scan. All data is in the OS cache (no actual disk reads). With that I can not discern any changes between commenting the schemaMetrics stuff, vs not. [~jmspaggi] What are you plotting? Time or number of ops? I assume it's time, since all of my perf improvements went into 0.94.4. > HFile performance regression between 0.92 and 0.94 > -------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HBASE-7868 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-7868 > Project: HBase > Issue Type: Bug > Components: io > Affects Versions: 0.94.5 > Reporter: Matteo Bertozzi > Assignee: Matteo Bertozzi > Fix For: 0.94.6 > > Attachments: FilteredScan.png, hfileperf-graphs.png > > > By HFilePerformanceEvaluation seems that 0.94 is slower then 0.92 > Looking at the profiler for the Scan path, seems that most of the time, compared to 92, is spent in the metrics dictionary lookup. [~eclark] pointed out the new per family/block metrics. > By commenting the metrics call in HFileReaderV2, the performance seems to get better, but maybe metrics is not the only problem. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira