hbase-issues mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Lars Hofhansl (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] [Commented] (HBASE-7868) HFile performance regression between 0.92 and 0.94
Date Mon, 18 Feb 2013 01:06:12 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-7868?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13580350#comment-13580350

Lars Hofhansl commented on HBASE-7868:

[~eclark] Presumably the overhead of the metric update would be negligible compared to the
time/effort it takes to actually load the block. At least that was my assumption when reviewing
HBASE-6852. Maybe I assumed incorrectly.

> HFile performance regression between 0.92 and 0.94
> --------------------------------------------------
>                 Key: HBASE-7868
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-7868
>             Project: HBase
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: io
>    Affects Versions: 0.94.5
>            Reporter: Matteo Bertozzi
>            Assignee: Matteo Bertozzi
>             Fix For: 0.94.6
>         Attachments: hfileperf-graphs.png
> By HFilePerformanceEvaluation seems that 0.94 is slower then 0.92
> Looking at the profiler for the Scan path, seems that most of the time, compared to 92,
is spent in the metrics dictionary lookup. [~eclark] pointed out the new per family/block
> By commenting the metrics call in HFileReaderV2, the performance seems to get better,
but maybe metrics is not the only problem.

This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

View raw message