hbase-issues mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Lars Hofhansl (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] [Updated] (HBASE-7755) Experiment with LAB in BlockEndcoding
Date Mon, 04 Feb 2013 06:40:14 GMT

     [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-7755?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]

Lars Hofhansl updated HBASE-7755:
---------------------------------

    Attachment: 7755-0.94-W_I_P_v1.txt

Version that only LAB if the scanner does seek+read (as opposed to pread).

With this there should be not detrimental performance for Gets (which will setup their scanners
with pread).
                
> Experiment with LAB in BlockEndcoding
> -------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HBASE-7755
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-7755
>             Project: HBase
>          Issue Type: Bug
>            Reporter: Lars Hofhansl
>             Fix For: 0.94.6
>
>         Attachments: 7755-0.94-W_I_P_v1.txt, 7755-0.94-WORK_IN_PROGRESS.txt
>
>
> I was looking at and profiling the BlockEncoding code to figure out how to make it faster.
One issue that jumped out was we call ByteBuffer.allocate(...) for each single KV.
> As an experiment I tried using the MemStoreLAB code to allocate those buffers.
> Here are some preliminary numbers, all scanning 10m rows (all in cache):
> * no encoding: 5.2s
> * FAST_DIFF without patch: 7.3s
> * FAST_DIFF with patch and small LAB: 4.1s
> * FAST_DIFF with patch and large LAB: 11s
> So this is very sensitive to the right sizing of the LAB.
> Need to do a bit more testing, but it seems that there is a chance to actually make scanning
with block encoding faster than without!

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

Mime
View raw message