Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hbase-issues-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hbase-issues-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 49E7CD791 for ; Mon, 17 Dec 2012 22:42:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 88290 invoked by uid 500); 17 Dec 2012 22:42:25 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hbase-issues-archive@hbase.apache.org Received: (qmail 88213 invoked by uid 500); 17 Dec 2012 22:42:25 -0000 Mailing-List: contact issues-help@hbase.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list issues@hbase.apache.org Received: (qmail 88192 invoked by uid 99); 17 Dec 2012 22:42:25 -0000 Received: from arcas.apache.org (HELO arcas.apache.org) (140.211.11.28) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 17 Dec 2012 22:42:25 +0000 Date: Mon, 17 Dec 2012 22:42:25 +0000 (UTC) From: "Andrew Purtell (JIRA)" To: issues@hbase.apache.org Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HBASE-7367) Snapshot coprocessor and ACL security MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-7367?page=3Dcom.atlassian= .jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=3D1353= 4389#comment-13534389 ]=20 Andrew Purtell commented on HBASE-7367: --------------------------------------- I'm also saying that the global admin check is so trivial it seems strange = if you would not entertain this feedback even on your branch. bq. my question now is =E2=80=93 if we add the global admin privs checks, w= ould this be sufficient functionality for when attempting to merge to trunk= ? In my opinion, yes.=20 I'd want to dig deeper afterward though as a follow up JIRA. Having ACL rec= onstruction after a clone or restore be a manual task, even if described in= detail in the docs, would be a pain. I'd want to see how/if the AccessCont= roller could cooperate to make that easier. =20 > Snapshot coprocessor and ACL security > ------------------------------------- > > Key: HBASE-7367 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-7367 > Project: HBase > Issue Type: Sub-task > Components: Client, master, regionserver, snapshots, Zookeeper > Reporter: Matteo Bertozzi > Assignee: Matteo Bertozzi > Priority: Minor > Fix For: hbase-6055, 0.96.0 > > Attachments: HBASE-7367-v0.patch > > > Currently snapshot don't care about ACL... > and in the first draft snapshots should be disabled if the ACL coprocesso= r is enabled. > After the first step, we can discuss how to handle the snapshot/restore/c= lone. > Is saving and restoring the _acl_ related rights, the right way? maybe af= ter 3 months we don't want to give the access the guys listed in the old _a= cl_... -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrato= rs For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira