Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hbase-issues-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hbase-issues-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id BAB85DBDB for ; Thu, 1 Nov 2012 18:57:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 91628 invoked by uid 500); 1 Nov 2012 18:57:12 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hbase-issues-archive@hbase.apache.org Received: (qmail 91576 invoked by uid 500); 1 Nov 2012 18:57:12 -0000 Mailing-List: contact issues-help@hbase.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list issues@hbase.apache.org Received: (qmail 91567 invoked by uid 99); 1 Nov 2012 18:57:12 -0000 Received: from arcas.apache.org (HELO arcas.apache.org) (140.211.11.28) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 01 Nov 2012 18:57:12 +0000 Date: Thu, 1 Nov 2012 18:57:12 +0000 (UTC) From: "Lars Hofhansl (JIRA)" To: issues@hbase.apache.org Message-ID: <1340315208.57312.1351796232497.JavaMail.jiratomcat@arcas> In-Reply-To: <313327856.156088.1349209628641.JavaMail.jiratomcat@arcas> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HBASE-6925) Change socket write size from 8K to 64K for HBaseServer MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-6925?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13488928#comment-13488928 ] Lars Hofhansl commented on HBASE-6925: -------------------------------------- I'd definitely be interested in the various changes that went into this. HBASE-4956 just fixes Result.readFields to read the resultbuffer in 8k chunks? Would that defeat the purpose of this change? I can do some quick test on a single host, but that won't be very representative. > Change socket write size from 8K to 64K for HBaseServer > ------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HBASE-6925 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-6925 > Project: HBase > Issue Type: Sub-task > Components: Performance > Reporter: Karthik Ranganathan > Assignee: Karthik Ranganathan > Priority: Critical > Fix For: 0.94.3, 0.96.0 > > Attachments: HBASE-6925.patch > > > Creating a JIRA for this, but the change is trivial: change NIO_BUFFER_LIMIT from 8K to 64K in HBaseServer. This seems to increase scan throughput. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira