hbase-issues mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Hudson (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] [Commented] (HBASE-7060) Region load balancing by table does not handle the case where a table's region count is lower than the number of the RS in the cluster
Date Mon, 05 Nov 2012 01:36:40 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-7060?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13490401#comment-13490401
] 

Hudson commented on HBASE-7060:
-------------------------------

Integrated in HBase-0.94-security-on-Hadoop-23 #9 (See [https://builds.apache.org/job/HBase-0.94-security-on-Hadoop-23/9/])
    HBASE-7060 Region load balancing by table does not handle the case where a table's region
count is lower than the number of the RS in the cluster (Ted Yu and Tianying) (Revision 1403801)

     Result = FAILURE
tedyu : 
Files : 
* /hbase/branches/0.94/src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/hbase/master/DefaultLoadBalancer.java

                
> Region load balancing by table does not handle the case where a table's region count
is lower than the number of the RS in the cluster
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HBASE-7060
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-7060
>             Project: HBase
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: master
>    Affects Versions: 0.92.0
>            Reporter: Tianying Chang
>            Assignee: Ted Yu
>             Fix For: 0.94.3, 0.96.0
>
>         Attachments: 7060-94.txt, 7060-94-v2.txt, 7060-test-tentative-94.txt, 7060-trunk.txt,
HBASE-7060.patch
>
>
> When the table's region count is less than the count of region servers, the region balance
algorithm will not move the region. For example, the cluster has 100 RS, the table has 50
regions sitting on one RS, they will not be moved to any of the other 99 RS.
> This is because the algorithm did not calculate the under-loaded RS correctly. This is
how the algorithm works with the above example:
> avg-regions-per-RS=0.5
> min-RS-per-RS=0
> max-RS-per-RS=1
> when they calculate the under loaded RS, the code is as below. Since regionCount=0, which
is always >=min, so it will always skip, therefore, no underloaded RS are found.
> Map<ServerName, Integer> underloadedServers = new HashMap<ServerName, Integer>();
> for (Map.Entry<ServerAndLoad, List<HRegionInfo>> server:
> serversByLoad.entrySet()) {
> int regionCount = server.getKey().getLoad();
> if (regionCount >= min) { break; }
> underloadedServers.put(server.getKey().getServerName(), min - regionCount);
> }
> Later the function returns since underloaded RS size is 0
> if (serverUnerloaded ==0) return regionsToReturn;

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

Mime
View raw message