hbase-issues mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Lars Hofhansl (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] [Commented] (HBASE-5898) Consider double-checked locking for block cache lock
Date Tue, 06 Nov 2012 19:20:14 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5898?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13491732#comment-13491732
] 

Lars Hofhansl commented on HBASE-5898:
--------------------------------------

If nobody is willing to sponsor this (by committing), maybe it should not be committed...?

                
> Consider double-checked locking for block cache lock
> ----------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HBASE-5898
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5898
>             Project: HBase
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: Performance
>    Affects Versions: 0.94.1
>            Reporter: Todd Lipcon
>            Assignee: Todd Lipcon
>            Priority: Critical
>             Fix For: 0.94.3, 0.96.0
>
>         Attachments: 5898-TestBlocksRead.txt, HBASE-5898-0.patch, HBASE-5898-1.patch,
hbase-5898.txt
>
>
> Running a workload with a high query rate against a dataset that fits in cache, I saw
a lot of CPU being used in IdLock.getLockEntry, being called by HFileReaderV2.readBlock. Even
though it was all cache hits, it was wasting a lot of CPU doing lock management here. I wrote
a quick patch to switch to a double-checked locking and it improved throughput substantially
for this workload.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

Mime
View raw message