Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hbase-issues-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hbase-issues-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 5CC03DC2C for ; Tue, 23 Oct 2012 21:44:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 27007 invoked by uid 500); 23 Oct 2012 21:44:13 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hbase-issues-archive@hbase.apache.org Received: (qmail 26944 invoked by uid 500); 23 Oct 2012 21:44:13 -0000 Mailing-List: contact issues-help@hbase.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list issues@hbase.apache.org Received: (qmail 26935 invoked by uid 99); 23 Oct 2012 21:44:13 -0000 Received: from arcas.apache.org (HELO arcas.apache.org) (140.211.11.28) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 23 Oct 2012 21:44:13 +0000 Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2012 21:44:13 +0000 (UTC) From: "Elliott Clark (JIRA)" To: issues@hbase.apache.org Message-ID: <1907369563.18479.1351028653125.JavaMail.jiratomcat@arcas> In-Reply-To: <779740623.7076.1335669311348.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HBASE-5898) Consider double-checked locking for block cache lock MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5898?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Elliott Clark updated HBASE-5898: --------------------------------- Attachment: HBASE-5898-0.patch We saw this on a production cluster. A single data block was being requested by all ipc handlers. This caused a great deal of lock contention. Todd's patch fixed the issue and caused reads to go back to a normal duration. This patch is almost identical to Todd's patch. It makes the second try to get a block from the block cache not count as a miss. > Consider double-checked locking for block cache lock > ---------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HBASE-5898 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5898 > Project: HBase > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: Performance > Affects Versions: 0.94.1 > Reporter: Todd Lipcon > Assignee: Todd Lipcon > Priority: Critical > Attachments: 5898-TestBlocksRead.txt, HBASE-5898-0.patch, hbase-5898.txt > > > Running a workload with a high query rate against a dataset that fits in cache, I saw a lot of CPU being used in IdLock.getLockEntry, being called by HFileReaderV2.readBlock. Even though it was all cache hits, it was wasting a lot of CPU doing lock management here. I wrote a quick patch to switch to a double-checked locking and it improved throughput substantially for this workload. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira