Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hbase-issues-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hbase-issues-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 4019ED7CC for ; Tue, 25 Sep 2012 16:30:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 11731 invoked by uid 500); 25 Sep 2012 16:30:09 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hbase-issues-archive@hbase.apache.org Received: (qmail 11684 invoked by uid 500); 25 Sep 2012 16:30:09 -0000 Mailing-List: contact issues-help@hbase.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list issues@hbase.apache.org Received: (qmail 11604 invoked by uid 99); 25 Sep 2012 16:30:09 -0000 Received: from arcas.apache.org (HELO arcas.apache.org) (140.211.11.28) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 25 Sep 2012 16:30:09 +0000 Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2012 03:30:09 +1100 (NCT) From: "Hadoop QA (JIRA)" To: issues@hbase.apache.org Message-ID: <1827476807.123243.1348590609738.JavaMail.jiratomcat@arcas> In-Reply-To: <2083646330.110488.1348284128125.JavaMail.jiratomcat@arcas> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HBASE-6868) Skip checksum is broke; are we double-checksumming by default? MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-6868?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13462923#comment-13462923 ] Hadoop QA commented on HBASE-6868: ---------------------------------- -1 overall. Here are the results of testing the latest attachment http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12546437/6868-0.96-v3.txt against trunk revision . +1 @author. The patch does not contain any @author tags. -1 tests included. The patch doesn't appear to include any new or modified tests. Please justify why no new tests are needed for this patch. Also please list what manual steps were performed to verify this patch. +1 hadoop2.0. The patch compiles against the hadoop 2.0 profile. -1 javadoc. The javadoc tool appears to have generated 140 warning messages. +1 javac. The applied patch does not increase the total number of javac compiler warnings. -1 findbugs. The patch appears to introduce 6 new Findbugs (version 1.3.9) warnings. +1 release audit. The applied patch does not increase the total number of release audit warnings. -1 core tests. The patch failed these unit tests: Test results: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/2931//testReport/ Findbugs warnings: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/2931//artifact/trunk/patchprocess/newPatchFindbugsWarningshbase-hadoop2-compat.html Findbugs warnings: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/2931//artifact/trunk/patchprocess/newPatchFindbugsWarningshbase-server.html Findbugs warnings: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/2931//artifact/trunk/patchprocess/newPatchFindbugsWarningshbase-hadoop1-compat.html Findbugs warnings: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/2931//artifact/trunk/patchprocess/newPatchFindbugsWarningshbase-common.html Findbugs warnings: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/2931//artifact/trunk/patchprocess/newPatchFindbugsWarningshbase-hadoop-compat.html Console output: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/2931//console This message is automatically generated. > Skip checksum is broke; are we double-checksumming by default? > -------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HBASE-6868 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-6868 > Project: HBase > Issue Type: Bug > Components: HFile, wal > Affects Versions: 0.94.0, 0.94.1 > Reporter: LiuLei > Priority: Blocker > Fix For: 0.94.3, 0.96.0 > > Attachments: 6868-0.96-idea.txt, 6868-0.96-v2.txt, 6868-0.96-v3.txt > > > The HFile contains checksums for decrease the iops, so when Hbase read HFile , that dont't need to read the checksum from meta file of HDFS. But HLog file of Hbase don't contain the checksum, so when HBase read the HLog, that must read checksum from meta file of HDFS. We could add setSkipChecksum per file to hdfs or we could write checksums into WAL if this skip checksum facility is enabled -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira