hbase-issues mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Lars Hofhansl (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] [Commented] (HBASE-6647) [performance regression] appendNoSync/HBASE-4528 doesn't take deferred log flush into account
Date Fri, 31 Aug 2012 04:39:07 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-6647?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13445650#comment-13445650

Lars Hofhansl commented on HBASE-6647:

I'm happy to do it, just didn't want jump ahead and your commit your patch.

If you have time now, you could commit it, otherwise I'll do it tomorrow morning...?

> [performance regression] appendNoSync/HBASE-4528 doesn't take deferred log flush into
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>                 Key: HBASE-6647
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-6647
>             Project: HBase
>          Issue Type: Bug
>    Affects Versions: 0.94.0
>            Reporter: Jean-Daniel Cryans
>            Assignee: Jean-Daniel Cryans
>             Fix For: 0.96.0, 0.94.2
>         Attachments: HBASE-6647-0.94.patch, HBASE-6647-0.94-v2.patch, HBASE-6647-0.94-v3.patch,
> Since we upgraded to 0.94.1 from 0.92 I saw that our ICVs are about twice as slow as
they were. jstack'ing I saw that most of the time we are waiting on sync()... but those tables
have deferred log flush turned on so they shouldn't even be calling it.
> HTD.isDeferredLogFlush is currently only called in the append() methods which are pretty
much not in use anymore.

This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

View raw message