hbase-issues mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Alex Baranau (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] [Commented] (HBASE-6618) Implement FuzzyRowFilter with ranges support
Date Thu, 23 Aug 2012 12:33:42 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-6618?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13440242#comment-13440242
] 

Alex Baranau commented on HBASE-6618:
-------------------------------------

Ah, sorry, haven't said anything about that. For toInc - we may not change it at every step,
so if there's a missing arrow, that means nothing should be changed.

Thanx for checking out!

One thing that I'm not 100% sure about - is it better to adjust current FuzzyRowFilter and
this functionality to it or add new. I'm leaning towards adjusting FuzzyRowFilter as this
new feature fits naturally in it. Thoughts?
                
> Implement FuzzyRowFilter with ranges support
> --------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HBASE-6618
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-6618
>             Project: HBase
>          Issue Type: New Feature
>          Components: filters
>            Reporter: Alex Baranau
>            Priority: Minor
>         Attachments: HBASE-6618-algo-desc-bits.png, HBASE-6618-algo.patch
>
>
> Apart from current ability to specify fuzzy row filter e.g. for <userId_actionId>
format as ????_0004 (where 0004 - actionId) it would be great to also have ability to specify
the "fuzzy range" , e.g. ????_0004, ..., ????_0099.
> See initial discussion here: http://search-hadoop.com/m/WVLJdX0Z65
> Note: currently it is possible to provide multiple fuzzy row rules to existing FuzzyRowFilter,
but in case when the range is big (contains thousands of values) it is not efficient.
> Filter should perform efficient fast-forwarding during the scan (this is what distinguishes
it from regex row filter).
> While such functionality may seem like a proper fit for custom filter (i.e. not including
into standard filter set) it looks like the filter may be very re-useable. We may judge based
on the implementation that will hopefully be added.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

        

Mime
View raw message