hbase-issues mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Jean-Daniel Cryans (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] [Updated] (HBASE-6647) [performance regression] appendNoSync/HBASE-4528 doesn't take deferred log flush into account
Date Fri, 31 Aug 2012 05:03:08 GMT

     [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-6647?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel

Jean-Daniel Cryans updated HBASE-6647:

      Resolution: Fixed
    Hadoop Flags: Reviewed
          Status: Resolved  (was: Patch Available)

Committed to 0.94 and 0.96, thanks for the reviews guys.
> [performance regression] appendNoSync/HBASE-4528 doesn't take deferred log flush into
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>                 Key: HBASE-6647
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-6647
>             Project: HBase
>          Issue Type: Bug
>    Affects Versions: 0.94.0
>            Reporter: Jean-Daniel Cryans
>            Assignee: Jean-Daniel Cryans
>             Fix For: 0.96.0, 0.94.2
>         Attachments: HBASE-6647-0.94.patch, HBASE-6647-0.94-v2.patch, HBASE-6647-0.94-v3.patch,
> Since we upgraded to 0.94.1 from 0.92 I saw that our ICVs are about twice as slow as
they were. jstack'ing I saw that most of the time we are waiting on sync()... but those tables
have deferred log flush turned on so they shouldn't even be calling it.
> HTD.isDeferredLogFlush is currently only called in the append() methods which are pretty
much not in use anymore.

This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

View raw message