hbase-issues mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "stack (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] [Commented] (HBASE-6418) Minor bug in delete flow.
Date Wed, 18 Jul 2012 14:42:34 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-6418?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13417130#comment-13417130

stack commented on HBASE-6418:

Assuming the mighty @Laxman comes over to Anoop and Lars' way of thinking, is there anything
we can do to make it so others don't think the same?  Can we add code comment, a unit test,
or update doc somewhere so we avoid others having same (mis)understanding?  Anoop, any of
your testing that could go in as a unit test?  Attach here and I can commit.
> Minor bug in delete flow.
> -------------------------
>                 Key: HBASE-6418
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-6418
>             Project: HBase
>          Issue Type: Bug
>    Affects Versions: 0.94.0, 0.96.0, 0.94.1, 0.94.2
>            Reporter: Laxman
>            Assignee: Laxman
> Timestamp updation in Delete flow is not considering all flavors (Delete record, Delete
Family, Delete Column) of Delete API. Currently its considering Delete Record only. 
> org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver.HRegion.prepareDeleteTimestamps(Delete, byte[])
> {code}
>       for (KeyValue kv: kvs) {
>         //  Check if time is LATEST, change to time of most recent addition if so
>         //  This is expensive.
>         if (kv.isLatestTimestamp() && kv.isDeleteType()) {
> {code}
> Basically used a wrong API.
> kv.isDeleteType() should be KeyValue.isDelete(type);

This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira


View raw message