hbase-issues mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Jesse Yates (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] [Commented] (HBASE-6180) [brainstorm] Timestamp based snapshots in HBase 0.96
Date Mon, 18 Jun 2012 20:15:43 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-6180?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13396211#comment-13396211

Jesse Yates commented on HBASE-6180:

Looking at the documentation from Amazon's hosted HBase solution (http://docs.amazonwebservices.com/ElasticMapReduce/latest/DeveloperGuide/emr-hbase-backup-restore.html),
they provide the option to do either a --consistent view (with synchronization across all
the nodes) or a globally inconsistent view (but per-node consistency).  I think keeping the
"current" full consistency as an option is a 'nice to have', but making the timestamp based
backup - fuzzy consistency - the default. 
> [brainstorm] Timestamp based snapshots in HBase 0.96
> ----------------------------------------------------
>                 Key: HBASE-6180
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-6180
>             Project: HBase
>          Issue Type: Brainstorming
>            Reporter: Jesse Yates
>             Fix For: 0.96.0
> Discussion ticket around doing timestamp based snapshots in HBase as an extension/follow-on
work for HBASE-6055. The implementation in HBASE-6055 (as originally defined) is not sufficient
for real-time clusters because it requires downtime to take the snapshot. 
> Time-stamp based snapshots should not require downtime at the cost of achieving global

This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira


View raw message