hbase-issues mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Benoit Sigoure (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] [Commented] (HBASE-5539) asynchbase PerformanceEvaluation
Date Fri, 22 Jun 2012 00:01:44 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5539?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13399011#comment-13399011

Benoit Sigoure commented on HBASE-5539:

Err...  I meant this issue depends on HBASE-5527 to be committed first.  That's why you were
missing the method {{getNumClientThreads()}} earlier.
> asynchbase PerformanceEvaluation
> --------------------------------
>                 Key: HBASE-5539
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5539
>             Project: HBase
>          Issue Type: New Feature
>          Components: performance
>            Reporter: Benoit Sigoure
>            Assignee: Benoit Sigoure
>            Priority: Minor
>              Labels: benchmark
>         Attachments: 0001-asynchbase-PerformanceEvaluation.patch, 0001-asynchbase-PerformanceEvaluation.patch,
5539-asynchbase-PerformanceEvaluation-v2.txt, 5539-asynchbase-PerformanceEvaluation-v3.txt,
> I plugged [asynchbase|https://github.com/stumbleupon/asynchbase] into {{PerformanceEvaluation}}.
 This enables testing asynchbase from {{PerformanceEvaluation}} and comparing its performance
to {{HTable}}.  Also asynchbase doesn't come with any benchmark, so it was good that I was
able to plug it into {{PerformanceEvaluation}} relatively easily.
> I am in the processing of collecting results on a dev cluster running 0.92.1 and will
publish them once they're ready.

This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira


View raw message