Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hbase-issues-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hbase-issues-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 47259C002 for ; Fri, 25 May 2012 15:19:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 34813 invoked by uid 500); 25 May 2012 15:19:23 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hbase-issues-archive@hbase.apache.org Received: (qmail 34757 invoked by uid 500); 25 May 2012 15:19:23 -0000 Mailing-List: contact issues-help@hbase.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list issues@hbase.apache.org Received: (qmail 34587 invoked by uid 99); 25 May 2012 15:19:23 -0000 Received: from issues-vm.apache.org (HELO issues-vm) (140.211.11.160) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 25 May 2012 15:19:23 +0000 Received: from isssues-vm.apache.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by issues-vm (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8133D14283D for ; Fri, 25 May 2012 15:19:23 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 25 May 2012 15:19:23 +0000 (UTC) From: "Jonathan Hsieh (JIRA)" To: issues@hbase.apache.org Message-ID: <1630695786.2582.1337959163530.JavaMail.jiratomcat@issues-vm> In-Reply-To: <1269894839.4447.1335561888011.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Comment Edited] (HBASE-5892) [hbck] Refactor parallel WorkItem* to Futures. MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5892?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13283369#comment-13283369 ] Jonathan Hsieh edited comment on HBASE-5892 at 5/25/12 3:19 PM: ---------------------------------------------------------------- Andrew, looks good. I'm going to wait for the hadoopqa robot to execute the test suite. Alternately, since this just modifies hbck, can you try this command and share results: 'mvn test -PlocalTests -Dtest=TestHBaseFsck'? I'd like to keep all hbck across versions essentially the same -- would you be willing to port to 0.90/0.92/0.94? I'd bet that this may apply to 0.94 and 0.92, and that 0.90 would require some near trivial tweaks. was (Author: jmhsieh): Andrew, looks good. I'm going to wait for the hadoopqa robot to execute the test suite. Alternately, since this just modifies hbck, can you try this command and share results: 'mvn test -PlocalTests -Dtest=TestHbaseFsck'? I'd like to keep all hbck across versions essentially the same -- would you be willing to port to 0.90/0.92/0.94? I'd bet that this may apply to 0.94 and 0.92, and that 0.90 would require some near trivial tweaks. > [hbck] Refactor parallel WorkItem* to Futures. > ---------------------------------------------- > > Key: HBASE-5892 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5892 > Project: HBase > Issue Type: Improvement > Reporter: Jonathan Hsieh > Assignee: Andrew Wang > Labels: noob > Attachments: hbase-5892.patch > > > This would convert WorkItem* logic (with low level notifies, and rough exception handling) into a more canonical Futures pattern. > Currently there are two instances of this pattern (for loading hdfs dirs, for contacting regionservers for assignments, and soon -- for loading hdfs .regioninfo files). -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira