Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hbase-issues-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hbase-issues-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 900CECF1D for ; Mon, 21 May 2012 19:05:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 78317 invoked by uid 500); 21 May 2012 19:05:41 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hbase-issues-archive@hbase.apache.org Received: (qmail 78265 invoked by uid 500); 21 May 2012 19:05:41 -0000 Mailing-List: contact issues-help@hbase.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list issues@hbase.apache.org Received: (qmail 78244 invoked by uid 99); 21 May 2012 19:05:41 -0000 Received: from issues-vm.apache.org (HELO issues-vm) (140.211.11.160) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 21 May 2012 19:05:41 +0000 Received: from isssues-vm.apache.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by issues-vm (Postfix) with ESMTP id 21CA714282A for ; Mon, 21 May 2012 19:05:41 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 21 May 2012 19:05:41 +0000 (UTC) From: "nkeywal (JIRA)" To: issues@hbase.apache.org Message-ID: <1540461719.4304.1337627141141.JavaMail.jiratomcat@issues-vm> In-Reply-To: <633932761.42546.1336538747099.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HBASE-5970) Improve the AssignmentManager#updateTimer and speed up handling opened event MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5970?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13280367#comment-13280367 ] nkeywal commented on HBASE-5970: -------------------------------- Hi, Could you share the logs of the tests? I would be interested to have a look at them. The javadoc for updateTimers says it's not used for bulk assignment, is there a mix of regions 'bulk assigned' and other regions? I see as well in the description that the time was once with 'retainAssignment=true' and once without. Are the results comparable in both cases? Thank you! > Improve the AssignmentManager#updateTimer and speed up handling opened event > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HBASE-5970 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5970 > Project: HBase > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: master > Reporter: chunhui shen > Assignee: chunhui shen > Attachments: 5970v3.patch, HBASE-5970.patch, HBASE-5970v2.patch, HBASE-5970v3.patch > > > We found handing opened event very slow in the environment with lots of regions. > The problem is the slow AssignmentManager#updateTimer. > We do the test for bulk assigning 10w (i.e. 100k) regions, the whole process of bulk assigning took 1 hours. > 2012-05-06 20:31:49,201 INFO org.apache.hadoop.hbase.master.AssignmentManager: Bulk assigning 100000 region(s) round-robin across 5 server(s) > 2012-05-06 21:26:32,103 INFO org.apache.hadoop.hbase.master.AssignmentManager: Bulk assigning done > I think we could do the improvement for the AssignmentManager#updateTimer: Make a thread do this work. > After the improvement, it took only 4.5mins > 2012-05-07 11:03:36,581 INFO org.apache.hadoop.hbase.master.AssignmentManager: Bulk assigning 100000 region(s) across 5 server(s), retainAssignment=true > 2012-05-07 11:07:57,073 INFO org.apache.hadoop.hbase.master.AssignmentManager: Bulk assigning done -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira