Mailing-List: contact issues-help@hbase.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2012 19:12:40 +0000 (UTC)
From: "Hadoop QA (Commented) (JIRA)" <jira@apache.org>
To: issues@hbase.apache.org
Message-ID: 
 <908658789.2226.1334776360154.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org>
Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HBASE-2600) Change how we do meta tables; from
 tablename+STARTROW+randomid to instead, tablename+ENDROW+randomid
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit


    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-2600?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13256857#comment-13256857 ] 

Hadoop QA commented on HBASE-2600:
----------------------------------

-1 overall.  Here are the results of testing the latest attachment 
  http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12523233/0001-HBASE-2600.v10.patch
  against trunk revision .

    +1 @author.  The patch does not contain any @author tags.

    +1 tests included.  The patch appears to include 65 new or modified tests.

    +1 javadoc.  The javadoc tool did not generate any warning messages.

    -1 javac.  The patch appears to cause mvn compile goal to fail.

    -1 findbugs.  The patch appears to cause Findbugs (version 1.3.9) to fail.

    +1 release audit.  The applied patch does not increase the total number of release audit warnings.

     -1 core tests.  The patch failed these unit tests:
     

Test results: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/1568//testReport/
Console output: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/1568//console

This message is automatically generated.
                
> Change how we do meta tables; from tablename+STARTROW+randomid to instead, tablename+ENDROW+randomid
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HBASE-2600
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-2600
>             Project: HBase
>          Issue Type: Bug
>            Reporter: stack
>            Assignee: Alex Newman
>         Attachments: 0001-Changed-regioninfo-format-to-use-endKey-instead-of-s.patch, 0001-HBASE-2600.-Change-how-we-do-meta-tables-from-tablen-v2.patch, 0001-HBASE-2600.-Change-how-we-do-meta-tables-from-tablen-v4.patch, 0001-HBASE-2600.-Change-how-we-do-meta-tables-from-tablen-v6.patch, 0001-HBASE-2600.-Change-how-we-do-meta-tables-from-tablen-v7.2.patch, 0001-HBASE-2600.-Change-how-we-do-meta-tables-from-tablen-v8, 0001-HBASE-2600.-Change-how-we-do-meta-tables-from-tablen-v8.1, 0001-HBASE-2600.-Change-how-we-do-meta-tables-from-tablen-v9.patch, 0001-HBASE-2600.-Change-how-we-do-meta-tables-from-tablen.patch, 0001-HBASE-2600.v10.patch, 2600-trunk-01-17.txt, HBASE-2600+5217-Sun-Mar-25-2012-v3.patch, HBASE-2600+5217-Sun-Mar-25-2012-v4.patch, hbase-2600-root.dir.tgz, jenkins.pdf
>
>
> This is an idea that Ryan and I have been kicking around on and off for a while now.
> If regionnames were made of tablename+endrow instead of tablename+startrow, then in the metatables, doing a search for the region that contains the wanted row, we'd just have to open a scanner using passed row and the first row found by the scan would be that of the region we need (If offlined parent, we'd have to scan to the next row).
> If we redid the meta tables in this format, we'd be using an access that is natural to hbase, a scan as opposed to the perverse, expensive getClosestRowBefore we currently have that has to walk backward in meta finding a containing region.
> This issue is about changing the way we name regions.
> If we were using scans, prewarming client cache would be near costless (as opposed to what we'll currently have to do which is first a getClosestRowBefore and then a scan from the closestrowbefore forward).
> Converting to the new method, we'd have to run a migration on startup changing the content in meta.
> Up to this, the randomid component of a region name has been the timestamp of region creation.   HBASE-2531 "32-bit encoding of regionnames waaaaaaayyyyy too susceptible to hash clashes" proposes changing the randomid so that it contains actual name of the directory in the filesystem that hosts the region.  If we had this in place, I think it would help with the migration to this new way of doing the meta because as is, the region name in fs is a hash of regionname... changing the format of the regionname would mean we generate a different hash... so we'd need hbase-2531 to be in place before we could do this change.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira