Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hbase-issues-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hbase-issues-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 8AE439089 for ; Sun, 29 Apr 2012 02:31:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 84278 invoked by uid 500); 29 Apr 2012 02:31:12 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hbase-issues-archive@hbase.apache.org Received: (qmail 84246 invoked by uid 500); 29 Apr 2012 02:31:12 -0000 Mailing-List: contact issues-help@hbase.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list issues@hbase.apache.org Received: (qmail 84235 invoked by uid 99); 29 Apr 2012 02:31:12 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 29 Apr 2012 02:31:11 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 29 Apr 2012 02:31:09 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9BF1742673F for ; Sun, 29 Apr 2012 02:30:48 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sun, 29 Apr 2012 02:30:48 +0000 (UTC) From: "Todd Lipcon (JIRA)" To: issues@hbase.apache.org Message-ID: <1561788850.7050.1335666648640.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <399335940.7048.1335666288507.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HBASE-5897) prePut coprocessor hook causing substantial CPU usage MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5897?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13264449#comment-13264449 ] Todd Lipcon commented on HBASE-5897: ------------------------------------ Test methodology: I'm running a single standalone HBase on local filesystem. I rm the dir from /tmp, then start the master, create a table with a single column family, then restart the master with "time bin/hbase master". I then insert 1M rows from YCSB, and hit ^C on the master. I ran the test with the preput hook left in, and with it commented out, and flipped between the two setups twice to make sure I could reproduce. I'm reporting the user and system CPU here, since the wall clock time is sensitive to how quickly I ran the commands. with hook commented out: run 1: user 1m57.760s sys 0m3.300s run 2: user 1m54.840s sys 0m3.870s with cp hook left in: run 1: user 3m13.890s sys 0m3.940s run 2: user 3m11.960s sys 0m3.930s I also re-ran the original oprofile analysis and "doMiniBatchPut" basically dropped off the CPU profile results once I made this change. I verified for sure that I have no coprocessors installed by adding a println in RegionCoprocessorHost - it didn't print out. > prePut coprocessor hook causing substantial CPU usage > ----------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HBASE-5897 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5897 > Project: HBase > Issue Type: Bug > Affects Versions: 0.92.0 > Reporter: Todd Lipcon > > I was running an insert workload against trunk under oprofile and saw that a significant portion of CPU usage was going to calling the "prePut" coprocessor hook inside doMiniBatchPut, even though I don't have any coprocessors installed. I ran a million-row insert and collected CPU time spent in the RS after commenting out the preput hook, and found CPU usage reduced by 33%. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira