hbase-issues mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Hadoop QA (Commented) (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] [Commented] (HBASE-5599) [hbck] handle NO_VERSION_FILE and SHOULD_NOT_BE_DEPLOYED inconsistencies
Date Wed, 11 Apr 2012 07:28:20 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5599?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13251392#comment-13251392
] 

Hadoop QA commented on HBASE-5599:
----------------------------------

-1 overall.  Here are the results of testing the latest attachment 
  http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12522215/hbase-5599-trunk_v8.patch
  against trunk revision .

    +1 @author.  The patch does not contain any @author tags.

    +1 tests included.  The patch appears to include 6 new or modified tests.

    +1 javadoc.  The javadoc tool did not generate any warning messages.

    +1 javac.  The applied patch does not increase the total number of javac compiler warnings.

    -1 findbugs.  The patch appears to introduce 1 new Findbugs (version 1.3.9) warnings.

    +1 release audit.  The applied patch does not increase the total number of release audit
warnings.

     -1 core tests.  The patch failed these unit tests:
                       org.apache.hadoop.hbase.master.TestSplitLogManager

Test results: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/1476//testReport/
Findbugs warnings: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/1476//artifact/trunk/patchprocess/newPatchFindbugsWarnings.html
Console output: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/1476//console

This message is automatically generated.
                
> [hbck] handle NO_VERSION_FILE and SHOULD_NOT_BE_DEPLOYED inconsistencies
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HBASE-5599
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5599
>             Project: HBase
>          Issue Type: New Feature
>          Components: hbck
>    Affects Versions: 0.90.6
>            Reporter: fulin wang
>            Assignee: fulin wang
>         Attachments: 0.90-surefire-report-hbck.html, hbase-5599-0.90.patch, hbase-5599-0.90_v2.patch,
hbase-5599-0.90_v3.patch, hbase-5599-0.90_v5.patch, hbase-5599-0.90_v6.patch, hbase-5599-0.90_v7.patch,
hbase-5599-0.90_v8, hbase-5599-0.92_v5.patch, hbase-5599-0.94_v5.patch, hbase-5599-trunk_v5.patch,
hbase-5599-trunk_v7.patch, hbase-5599-trunk_v8.patch, license.png
>
>
> The hbck tool can not fix the six scenarios.
> 1. Version file does not exist in root dir.
>    Fix: I try to create a version file by 'FSUtils.setVersion' method.
>    
> 2. [REGIONNAME][KEY] on HDFS, but not listed in META or deployed on any region server.
>    Fix: I get region info form the hdfs file, this region info write to '.META.' table.
>    
> 3. [REGIONNAME][KEY] not in META, but deployed on [SERVERNAME]
>    Fix: I get region info form the hdfs file, this region info write to '.META.' table.
>    
> 4. [REGIONNAME] should not be deployed according to META, but is deployed on [SERVERNAME]
>    Fix: Close this region.
>    
> 5. First region should start with an empty key.  You need to  create a new region and
regioninfo in HDFS to plug the hole.
>    Fix: The region info is not in hdfs and .META., so it create a empty region for this
error.
> 6. There is a hole in the region chain between [KEY] and [KEY]. You need to create a
new regioninfo and region dir in hdfs to plug the hole.
>   Fix: The region info is not in hdfs and .META., so it create a empty region for this
hole.
>   

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

        

Mime
View raw message