hbase-issues mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Zhihong Yu (Commented) (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] [Commented] (HBASE-5241) Deletes should not mask Puts that come after it.
Date Thu, 16 Feb 2012 02:57:00 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5241?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13209092#comment-13209092
] 

Zhihong Yu commented on HBASE-5241:
-----------------------------------

I am in favor of internal timestamp so that we don't rely so much on real clock.
The initiative for this feature is to remove indeterminate behavior w.r.t. the timing of major
compaction.

I am in support of this feature. We can turn it off by default.
                
> Deletes should not mask Puts that come after it.
> ------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HBASE-5241
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5241
>             Project: HBase
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>            Reporter: Amitanand Aiyer
>         Attachments: HBASE-5241.D1731.1.patch
>
>
> Suppose that we have a delete row, and then followed by the put. The delete row
> can mask the put, unless there was a major compaction in between.
> Now that we are flushing the memstoreTS to disk, along with the KVs, we should be able
> to differentiate whether or not the Put happened after the Delete and offer better 
> delete semantics.
> Couldn't find a pre-existing JIRA that already discusses this, so creating one.
> Seems related to https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-2406, but is not quite the
same.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

        

Mime
View raw message