hbase-issues mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Lars Hofhansl (Commented) (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] [Commented] (HBASE-5229) Explore building blocks for "multi-row" local transactions.
Date Tue, 07 Feb 2012 06:03:05 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5229?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13202105#comment-13202105
] 

Lars Hofhansl commented on HBASE-5229:
--------------------------------------

It's even simpler. A coprocessor endpoint has access to its region. If I rename internalMutate
from my patch to mutateRowsWithLocks(List<Mutations> mutations, Set<String> rowsToLock)
and make it public in HRegion, it can be called from a coprocessor endpoint.
It would not exposed in HRegionInterface, HRegionServer, RegionServerServices, or the HTableInterfaces.
                
> Explore building blocks for "multi-row" local transactions.
> -----------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HBASE-5229
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5229
>             Project: HBase
>          Issue Type: New Feature
>          Components: client, regionserver
>            Reporter: Lars Hofhansl
>            Assignee: Lars Hofhansl
>             Fix For: 0.94.0
>
>         Attachments: 5229-multiRow-v2.txt, 5229-multiRow.txt, 5229-seekto-v2.txt, 5229-seekto.txt,
5229.txt
>
>
> HBase should provide basic building blocks for multi-row local transactions. Local means
that we do this by co-locating the data. Global (cross region) transactions are not discussed
here.
> After a bit of discussion two solutions have emerged:
> 1. Keep the row-key for determining grouping and location and allow efficient intra-row
scanning. A client application would then model tables as HBase-rows.
> 2. Define a prefix-length in HTableDescriptor that defines a grouping of rows. Regions
will then never be split inside a grouping prefix.
> #1 is true to the current storage paradigm of HBase.
> #2 is true to the current client side API.
> I will explore these two with sample patches here.
> --------------------
> Was:
> As discussed (at length) on the dev mailing list with the HBASE-3584 and HBASE-5203 committed,
supporting atomic cross row transactions within a region becomes simple.
> I am aware of the hesitation about the usefulness of this feature, but we have to start
somewhere.
> Let's use this jira for discussion, I'll attach a patch (with tests) momentarily to make
this concrete.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

        

Mime
View raw message