Mailing-List: contact issues-help@hbase.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Date: Wed, 4 Jan 2012 23:19:39 +0000 (UTC)
From: "Matt Corgan (Commented) (JIRA)" <jira@apache.org>
To: issues@hbase.apache.org
Message-ID: 
 <790014017.7042.1325719179853.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org>
In-Reply-To: 
 <657671452.46177.1313609127186.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org>
Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HBASE-4218) Data Block Encoding of KeyValues
  (aka delta encoding / prefix compression)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit


    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-4218?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13179973#comment-13179973 ] 

Matt Corgan commented on HBASE-4218:
------------------------------------

{quote}I think it is OK to ignore cached encoded blocks on compaction{quote}The circumstance i was worried about is if you are doing many small flushes and minor compactions.  The blocks to be compacted could mostly be in cache, and you would be ignoring them all.  I guess it doesn't matter if it's just for testing, but might give a false impression of performance.
                
> Data Block Encoding of KeyValues  (aka delta encoding / prefix compression)
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HBASE-4218
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-4218
>             Project: HBase
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: io
>    Affects Versions: 0.94.0
>            Reporter: Jacek Migdal
>            Assignee: Mikhail Bautin
>              Labels: compression
>             Fix For: 0.94.0
>
>         Attachments: 0001-Delta-encoding-fixed-encoded-scanners.patch, 0001-Delta-encoding.patch, 4218-v16.txt, 4218.txt, D447.1.patch, D447.10.patch, D447.11.patch, D447.12.patch, D447.13.patch, D447.14.patch, D447.15.patch, D447.16.patch, D447.17.patch, D447.2.patch, D447.3.patch, D447.4.patch, D447.5.patch, D447.6.patch, D447.7.patch, D447.8.patch, D447.9.patch, Data-block-encoding-2011-12-23.patch, Delta-encoding.patch-2011-12-22_11_52_07.patch, Delta_encoding_with_memstore_TS.patch, open-source.diff
>
>
> A compression for keys. Keys are sorted in HFile and they are usually very similar. Because of that, it is possible to design better compression than general purpose algorithms,
> It is an additional step designed to be used in memory. It aims to save memory in cache as well as speeding seeks within HFileBlocks. It should improve performance a lot, if key lengths are larger than value lengths. For example, it makes a lot of sense to use it when value is a counter.
> Initial tests on real data (key length = ~ 90 bytes , value length = 8 bytes) shows that I could achieve decent level of compression:
>  key compression ratio: 92%
>  total compression ratio: 85%
>  LZO on the same data: 85%
>  LZO after delta encoding: 91%
> While having much better performance (20-80% faster decompression ratio than LZO). Moreover, it should allow far more efficient seeking which should improve performance a bit.
> It seems that a simple compression algorithms are good enough. Most of the savings are due to prefix compression, int128 encoding, timestamp diffs and bitfields to avoid duplication. That way, comparisons of compressed data can be much faster than a byte comparator (thanks to prefix compression and bitfields).
> In order to implement it in HBase two important changes in design will be needed:
> -solidify interface to HFileBlock / HFileReader Scanner to provide seeking and iterating; access to uncompressed buffer in HFileBlock will have bad performance
> -extend comparators to support comparison assuming that N first bytes are equal (or some fields are equal)
> Link to a discussion about something similar:
> http://search-hadoop.com/m/5aqGXJEnaD1/hbase+windows&subj=Re+prefix+compression

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira