Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hbase-issues-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hbase-issues-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 2F53D744D for ; Wed, 21 Dec 2011 05:17:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 54603 invoked by uid 500); 21 Dec 2011 05:17:57 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hbase-issues-archive@hbase.apache.org Received: (qmail 54432 invoked by uid 500); 21 Dec 2011 05:17:56 -0000 Mailing-List: contact issues-help@hbase.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list issues@hbase.apache.org Received: (qmail 54424 invoked by uid 99); 21 Dec 2011 05:17:55 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 21 Dec 2011 05:17:55 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2002.5 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 21 Dec 2011 05:17:53 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA3C411ECF0 for ; Wed, 21 Dec 2011 05:17:30 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2011 05:17:30 +0000 (UTC) From: "Zhihong Yu (Commented) (JIRA)" To: issues@hbase.apache.org Message-ID: <1883390600.34237.1324444650895.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <657671452.46177.1313609127186.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HBASE-4218) Delta Encoding of KeyValues (aka prefix compression) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-4218?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13173865#comment-13173865 ] Zhihong Yu commented on HBASE-4218: ----------------------------------- Thanks for the nice work, Mikhail. {code} 1 out of 1 hunk ignored -- saving rejects to file src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/hbase/regionserver/HRegion.java.rej 1 out of 2 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file src/test/java/org/apache/hadoop/hbase/HFilePerformanceEvaluation.java.rej {code} Please fix the above conflicts by rebasing against TRUNK. > Delta Encoding of KeyValues (aka prefix compression) > ----------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HBASE-4218 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-4218 > Project: HBase > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: io > Affects Versions: 0.94.0 > Reporter: Jacek Migdal > Assignee: Mikhail Bautin > Labels: compression > Attachments: 0001-Delta-encoding-fixed-encoded-scanners.patch, D447.1.patch, D447.10.patch, D447.2.patch, D447.3.patch, D447.4.patch, D447.5.patch, D447.6.patch, D447.7.patch, D447.8.patch, D447.9.patch, Delta_encoding_with_memstore_TS.patch, open-source.diff > > > A compression for keys. Keys are sorted in HFile and they are usually very similar. Because of that, it is possible to design better compression than general purpose algorithms, > It is an additional step designed to be used in memory. It aims to save memory in cache as well as speeding seeks within HFileBlocks. It should improve performance a lot, if key lengths are larger than value lengths. For example, it makes a lot of sense to use it when value is a counter. > Initial tests on real data (key length = ~ 90 bytes , value length = 8 bytes) shows that I could achieve decent level of compression: > key compression ratio: 92% > total compression ratio: 85% > LZO on the same data: 85% > LZO after delta encoding: 91% > While having much better performance (20-80% faster decompression ratio than LZO). Moreover, it should allow far more efficient seeking which should improve performance a bit. > It seems that a simple compression algorithms are good enough. Most of the savings are due to prefix compression, int128 encoding, timestamp diffs and bitfields to avoid duplication. That way, comparisons of compressed data can be much faster than a byte comparator (thanks to prefix compression and bitfields). > In order to implement it in HBase two important changes in design will be needed: > -solidify interface to HFileBlock / HFileReader Scanner to provide seeking and iterating; access to uncompressed buffer in HFileBlock will have bad performance > -extend comparators to support comparison assuming that N first bytes are equal (or some fields are equal) > Link to a discussion about something similar: > http://search-hadoop.com/m/5aqGXJEnaD1/hbase+windows&subj=Re+prefix+compression -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira