hbase-issues mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Ted Yu (Commented) (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] [Commented] (HBASE-4718) Backport HBASE-4552 to 0.90 branch.
Date Thu, 03 Nov 2011 15:07:32 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-4718?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13143230#comment-13143230
] 

Ted Yu commented on HBASE-4718:
-------------------------------

Since enum was removed by HBASE-4716 addendum, I think patch v2 is closer to the current TRUNK.
                
> Backport HBASE-4552 to 0.90 branch.
> -----------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HBASE-4718
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-4718
>             Project: HBase
>          Issue Type: Bug
>    Affects Versions: 0.90.4
>            Reporter: Jonathan Hsieh
>            Assignee: Jonathan Hsieh
>         Attachments: 4718-v2.90, hbase-4718.0.90.patch, hbase-4718.v3.includes-hbase-3316.patch
>
>
> In discussion of HBASE-4552 / HBASE-4677 there has been some discussion about whether
and how to backport HBASE-4552 to the 0.90 branch.  This is a potentially compatibility breaking
so several approaches hav ebeen suggested.
> 1) provide patch but do not integrate
> 2) integrate patch that extends and deprecates old api without removing old api.  It
has been argued that  clients are supposed to use LoadIncrementalHFiles api and not at the
internal HRegionServer RPC api.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

        

Mime
View raw message