hbase-issues mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Ted Yu (Commented) (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] [Commented] (HBASE-3777) Redefine Identity Of HBase Configuration
Date Wed, 28 Sep 2011 16:14:45 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-3777?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13116575#comment-13116575
] 

Ted Yu commented on HBASE-3777:
-------------------------------

Test suite didn't go very far - TestLogRolling hangs
{code}
"main" prio=10 tid=0x0000000057197000 nid=0x3f12 waiting on condition [0x00000000406c8000]
   java.lang.Thread.State: TIMED_WAITING (sleeping)
        at java.lang.Thread.sleep(Native Method)
        at org.apache.hadoop.hbase.client.HBaseAdmin.deleteTable(HBaseAdmin.java:446)
        at org.apache.hadoop.hbase.client.HBaseAdmin.deleteTable(HBaseAdmin.java:393)
        at org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver.wal.TestLogRolling.testLogRollOnPipelineRestart(TestLogRolling.java:415)
{code}
                
> Redefine Identity Of HBase Configuration
> ----------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HBASE-3777
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-3777
>             Project: HBase
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: client, ipc
>    Affects Versions: 0.90.2
>            Reporter: Karthick Sankarachary
>            Assignee: Karthick Sankarachary
>            Priority: Minor
>             Fix For: 0.92.0
>
>         Attachments: 3777-TOF.patch, HBASE-3777-V2.patch, HBASE-3777-V3.patch, HBASE-3777-V4.patch,
HBASE-3777-V6.patch, HBASE-3777-V8.0.90.4.backport.patch, HBASE-3777.patch
>
>
> Judging from the javadoc in {{HConnectionManager}}, sharing connections across multiple
clients going to the same cluster is supposedly a good thing. However, the fact that there
is a one-to-one mapping between a configuration and connection instance, kind of works against
that goal. Specifically, when you create {{HTable}} instances using a given {{Configuration}}
instance and a copy thereof, we end up with two distinct {{HConnection}} instances under the
covers. Is this really expected behavior, especially given that the configuration instance
gets cloned a lot?
> Here, I'd like to play devil's advocate and propose that we "deep-compare" {{HBaseConfiguration}}
instances, so that multiple {{HBaseConfiguration}} instances that have the same properties
map to the same {{HConnection}} instance. In case one is "concerned that a single {{HConnection}}
is insufficient for sharing amongst clients",  to quote the javadoc, then one should be able
to mark a given {{HBaseConfiguration}} instance as being "uniquely identifiable".
> Note that "sharing connections makes clean up of {{HConnection}} instances a little awkward",
unless of course, you apply the change described in HBASE-3766.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

        

Mime
View raw message