hbase-issues mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Roman Shaposhnik (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] [Commented] (HBASE-4427) It would help to run a standalone HBase's ZK on a different port
Date Wed, 21 Sep 2011 20:31:08 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-4427?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13109854#comment-13109854
] 

Roman Shaposhnik commented on HBASE-4427:
-----------------------------------------

@stack, I was hoping other members of the community would chime in (one way or the other ;-))
but I guess it is just you and me.

So here's my attempt at convincing you that this is the right thing to do: at the end of the
day I believe that only an explicitly managed version of ZK can occupy a well-known client
port of 2181. Every other application that uses an embedded ZK to manage some kind of an ensemble
for its own purposes has to run its copy of ZK on a different port. Otherwise it is a bit
like having an embedded version of Jetty that would alway bind to 8080 -- not clean and source
of miscellaneous gotchas downstream when a real application server starts. 

Now, perhaps, to make things extra clear we should introduce an extra property called embeddedClientPort
or miniZKclientPort and let the existing be.

If you agree with this reasoning, I can attach a patch to make it happen according to the
scenario I've outlined. If not -- that's also fine, but please let me know either way.

> It would help to run a standalone HBase's ZK on a different port
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HBASE-4427
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-4427
>             Project: HBase
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: zookeeper
>    Affects Versions: 0.90.4
>            Reporter: Roman Shaposhnik
>            Assignee: Roman Shaposhnik
>            Priority: Minor
>
> It would be extremely helpful to have standalone HBase default to a non-standard port
for running its embedded ZK. This would help to run HBase on the same host where a legitimate
fully distributed ZK server, etc.
> It seems that the following addition to hbase-default.xml would be enough to make it
happen:
> {noformat}
> +  <property>
> +    <name>hbase.zookeeper.property.clientPort</name>
> +    <value>4181</value>
> +  </property>
> {noformat}
> This will take care of the master/client for HBase and can be overridden in hbase-site
if needed.
> Thoughts?

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

        

Mime
View raw message