hbase-issues mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Doug Meil (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] [Created] (HBASE-3737) HTable - delete(List<Delete>) doesn't use writebuffer
Date Tue, 05 Apr 2011 15:22:05 GMT
HTable - delete(List<Delete>) doesn't use writebuffer

                 Key: HBASE-3737
                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-3737
             Project: HBase
          Issue Type: Improvement
            Reporter: Doug Meil
            Priority: Minor

I just realized that htable.delete(List<Delete>) doesn't use the writebuffer and processes
the list immediately, but htable.put(List<Put>) does use the writebuffer (i.e., send
when filled). Likewise, htable.delete(Delete) sends immediately.
Out of sheer curiosity, why?  With the 'batch' methods now in place, it seems like it would
be consistent for 'delete' and 'put' to use the writebuffer (assuming it is expanded to hold
more than Puts), whereas 'batch' methods process immediately.

This isn't a huge issue, but it does seem a little inconsistent. 

This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

View raw message