hbase-issues mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Jean-Daniel Cryans (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] Commented: (HBASE-3499) Users upgrading to 0.90.0 need to have their .META. table updated with the right MEMSTORE_SIZE
Date Fri, 04 Feb 2011 22:10:30 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-3499?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12990776#comment-12990776
] 

Jean-Daniel Cryans commented on HBASE-3499:
-------------------------------------------

I thought the master could do it before that in the bootstrap...

> Users upgrading to 0.90.0 need to have their .META. table updated with the right MEMSTORE_SIZE
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HBASE-3499
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-3499
>             Project: HBase
>          Issue Type: Bug
>    Affects Versions: 0.90.0
>            Reporter: Jean-Daniel Cryans
>            Priority: Blocker
>             Fix For: 0.90.1
>
>
> With Jack Levin, we were able to figure that users that are upgrading from a 0.20.x era
cluster have their .META. schema set with a 16KB MEMSTORE_SIZE. This was done in order to
minimize lost meta rows when append wasn't available but even if we changed it in HTD, we
also have to make sure all users upgrading to 0.90 have it changed too.
> In Jack's case, he ended up with 2143 storefiles in .META. during a cold start, slowing
everything down. He reported a few times in the past that his .META. was always extremely
busy.
> We should be able to do it as a one-off thing in HMaster when opening .META. (an update
in place).

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

        

Mime
View raw message